Research Article |
Corresponding author: Katharine Glanville ( katharine.glanville@dsiti.qld.gov.au ) Academic editor: Oana Teodora Moldovan
© 2016 Katharine Glanville, Cameron Schulz, Moya Tomlinson, Don Butler.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Glanville K, Schulz C, Tomlinson M, Butler D (2016) Biodiversity and biogeography of groundwater invertebrates in Queensland, Australia. Subterranean Biology 17: 55-76. https://doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.17.7542
|
Groundwater systems, traditionally considered lifeless conduits of water (
Queensland is known to host 24 described families of stygofauna with stygofauna composition broadly consistent with other regions around the world. However Queensland assemblages tend to be unusually rich in both oligochaetes (16% cf. 2%) and syncarids (12% cf. 4%). Associations between stygofauna taxonomic richness and key environmental variables were consistent with many general assumptions of habitat suitability. However there were also notable exceptions, including stygofauna records from: groundwater 60 meters below ground level; groundwater with electrical conductivity above 50,000 μS/cm, and; both highly acidic (pH 3.5) and alkaline (pH 10.3) environments. These exceptions clearly demonstrate that strict adherence to general assumptions about habitat suitability when planning sampling activities may mask the true diversity of groundwater ecosystems.
Stygofauna, biogeographic patterns, subterranean aquatic fauna
Ecological and microbiological exploration of groundwater over the past two decades has identified a diverse range of organisms inhabiting groundwater systems, collectively called stygofauna (
The major pressures on groundwater systems in Australia, as elsewhere, are from anthropogenic activities that modify aspects of the groundwater regime, including flow, flux, pressure, level and quality (
Biological inventories have been used extensively to support management and conservation activities including development of conservation goals and identification of priority areas for conservation (
Queensland is a large state covering over 1.7 million square kilometres (
Groundwater occurs throughout Queensland in Mesozoic sedimentary basins and overlying Cainozoic deposits. Broad types of geologies that are sources of groundwater include unconsolidated sedimentary material (e.g. Quaternary alluvial and colluvial deposits, Quaternary coastal or inland sand deposits), consolidated sedimentary rocks (e.g. sandstone), fractured rocks (e.g. Cainozoic igneous rocks), and cavernous rocks (e.g. limestone karst systems).
A database of stygofauna inventory data for Queensland, the ‘Queensland Subterranean Aquatic Fauna Database’ (the database), was developed to compile available data in a standard format that facilitates value-adding activities such as comparative analysis and interpretation. From mid-2000 the Queensland Government has required stygofauna sampling to be undertaken as part of an environmental impact assessment for relevant mining, petroleum or gas developments under the Environmental Protection Act 1994 (Qld). Over twenty developments have undertaken stygofauna sampling as part of the environmental impact assessment process with results publicly reported in written reports. The database was designed as a low-cost, central repository of stygofauna data managed using MICROSOFT ACCESS® software and available to inform environmental planning and management.
The database was designed to meet initial data management requirements in terms of capturing available existing sampling data and providing flexibility to allow for the addition of new information in the future as monitoring and taxa identification techniques evolve. Currently the database has six major component tables and two supporting tables linked by two primary keys, a site identification number (e.g. bore hole registration number) and sample number (i.e. date of sampling event) (Figure
The wide variety of data contributors to the database required the establishment of the ‘Guideline for the Environmental Assessment of Subterranean Aquatic Fauna’ (
The Queensland Government is currently in the process of establishing regular dissemination of the releasable portions of the database to the general public through existing online delivery mechanisms including the Queensland Globe and the Queensland Spatial Catalogue, consistent with the government’s policy for open data. The regular release of the database is intended to facilitate value-adding activities and the development of data derivatives by users.
As of 1 October 2015, the database contained information from a total of 755 samples across 582 sites in Queensland. This includes comprehensive coverage of Queensland Government data, largely collected to support water planning activities, as well as industry data made publicly available through environmental impact statements. At present there is only limited incorporation of data from other sources such as research institutions. The database contains information on all sampling events, regardless of whether fauna were present or absent, because information on where fauna have not been found may be as valuable as where they have been recorded for planning and conservation purposes (
Stygofauna sampling in Queensland has predominantly involved hauling a plankton net of variable mesh size through the water column of a bore hole either exclusively (77.4%) or in combination with other sampling methods such as pumping and scraping (11.3%). The prevalence of plankton net sampling is due to the ease of application and the minimal time required for sample collection. Plankton net sampling assumes that the water column in the bore hole is representative of the biota and physico-chemical properties of water within the broader groundwater system (
Analysis of the diversity and biogeography of stygofauna is complicated by variations in the sampling methods. While 77.4% of samples were obtained using netting methods, in only 58.5% of these samples the netting method used was that specified in the ‘Guideline for the Environmental Assessment of Subterranean Aquatic Fauna’ (
Stygofauna sampling across Queensland is extremely sparse and geographically patchy. The spatial coverage of sampling has been clustered around locations of intensive groundwater resource development (e.g. the Murray–Darling Basin) and extractive industries (e.g. the Bowen Basin) (Figure
Outline map of Queensland, Australia highlighting the location of stygofauna sampling sites and other localities; In Figure 2 an outline map shows the location of all 582 stygofauna sampling sites and other key localities mentioned in the text (e.g. Bowen Basin, Murray–Darling Basin, Proserpine–Sarina Lowlands IBRA region).
The skew in sampling coverage extends to the types of groundwater systems sampled (Figure
Despite a clear sampling skew a wide range of lithologies has been found to support stygofauna communities, including unconsolidated sedimentary material (e.g. alluvium, sand), consolidated sedimentary rocks (e.g. sandstone), and fractured rocks (e.g. basalt, granite, volcanics), mirroring other Australian (
Stygofauna discovery rates by lithology in Queensland, Australia; In Figure 4 the discovery rate of stygofauna is indicated by numerical figures located above the columns, the total number of samples is indicated by numerical figures located along the x-axis, and the average stygofauna discovery rate (28%) is plotted as a grey, dashed line.
Available data include records of 24 described families and 23 described genera of stygofauna in Queensland (Supplementary material
Biogeography of described families in Queensland, Australia; In Figure 5 the total number of subregions a described family has been recorded inhabiting is indicated by numerical figures located to the right of the bars and the total number of samples is indicated by numerical figures located along the y-axis.
Diversity of described families in different IBRA subregions in Queensland, Australia; In Figure 6 the total number of described families is indicated by numerical figures located to the right of the bars and the total number of samples is indicated by numerical figures located along the y-axis.
A comparison of the habitat suitability of different lithologies is limited by the inconsistent sampling effort. However, variation in the diversity of described species suggests differences in habitat suitability exist between types of groundwater systems (Figure
Distribution of described families across different lithologies in Queensland, Australia; In Figure 8 the total number of lithologies is indicated by numerical figures located to the right of the bars and the total number of samples is indicated by numerical figures located along the y-axis.
The composition of Queensland stygofauna communities is comparable with knowledge of global stygofauna (
Comparison of systemic composition of described families from Australia and the World Average; In Figure 9 the systemic composition of described stygofauna families is compared between the Pilbara region (Western Australia, Australia) derived from
Many of the described families in Queensland are crustaceans (36%) including amphipods (e.g. Chillagoeidae, Paramelitidae), copepods (e.g. Cyclopidae) and ostracods (e.g. Candonidae, Darwinulidae) (Figure
The lack of detailed taxonomic identification undertaken for many samples precludes a more detailed analysis of stygofauna diversity in Queensland. The diversity analysis described above used family level data, utilising just 47.3% of all available samples. The remaining samples were predominantly identified to the order level, however about 5.7% of all available samples underwent no taxonomic identification at all. Available data (Supplementary material
The physico-chemical characteristics of groundwater systems can vary significantly on temporal and spatial scales, including variable depth to watertable, groundwater salinity, pH and the availability of organic carbon and oxygen (
Descriptive statistics of the physico-chemical properties of groundwater systems known to support stygofauna in Queensland, Australia. In Table
Physico-chemical variable | Range | Mean | Median | Standard error | Source |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Depth to groundwater (mbgl) | 0.1–63.2 | 13.7 | 10.5 | 1.1 | 1–9, 12–14, 16–19, 21–25 |
Electrical conductivity (μS/cm) | 11.5–54,800.0 | 3,924.0 | 1,348.0 | 733.1 | 1–4, 7–15, 17–26 |
Groundwater pH | 3.5–10.3 | 7.0 | 7.1 | 0.1 | 1–4, 7, 8, 10–15, 17–22, 24–26 |
Groundwater temperature (°C) | 17.0–30.7 | 23.5 | 23.9 | 0.3 | 1–4, 7, 8, 10, 13–15, 17–19, 21, 22, 24–26 |
Stygofauna taxon richness shows a general negative trend with increasing depth to groundwater (Figure
Scatterplots showing the relationship between stygofauna taxon richness per sample and different physico-chemical variables; In Figure 10 the scatterplots presented are based on available data in the Queensland Subterranean Aquatic Fauna database where: depth to groundwater is available for 113 samples in meters below ground level (mbgl); electrical conductivity is available for 137 samples in microSiemens per centimetre (μS/cm); pH is available for 130 samples; and temperature is available for 77 samples in degrees Celsius (°C).
Many of Queensland’s stygofauna communities are unstudied or understudied hampering both global and local comparisons. Despite this, Europe, North America and other areas of Australia (e.g. Western Australia) provide the most appropriate baseline for comparison given the higher survey effort employed in these regions (
Many stygofauna communities around the world are dominated by amphipods, copepods, and isopods (
Dissimilar to many other stygofauna communities around the world, stygofauna communities in Queensland have a low proportion of molluscs (4% cf. 10%;
Biological inventories are a cost-effective option to capture and maintain baseline records to support management and conservation activities such as assessments of biological diversity and endemism. Interrogation of the database developed to collate available biological information on stygofauna enabled the authors to complete comparative analysis and interpretation at the state scale providing significant insights into the biogeography and diversity of stygofauna in Queensland.
Queensland is known to host at least 24 described families and 23 described genera of stygofauna across 9 of the 17 major stygofauna taxonomic groups. Undescribed families have also been recorded across a further 3 major stygofauna taxonomic groups. The composition of stygofauna in Queensland is broadly consistent with the world average with the notable exception of high richness of oligochaetes and syncarids. Despite indications that a significant diversity of stygofauna is likely to exist across Queensland groundwater systems, stygofauna biodiversity largely remains undocumented and underrepresented in the above analysis. This underrepresentation is likely due to limited sampling coverage, limited taxonomic resolution (
Stygofauna were recorded inhabiting a wide range of lithologies, including: unconsolidated sedimentary materials; consolidated sedimentary rocks; and fractured rocks. While the proportion of samples found to contain stygofauna varied considerably by lithology indicating some differences in habitat suitability, it was evident that a groundwater system cannot be excluded from the possibility of supporting stygofauna based purely on geology or lithology. Similarly, variations in stygofauna taxonomic richness indicate some degree of habitat preference based on the physico-chemical properties of groundwater systems. However there were sufficient notable exceptions to demonstrate that stygofauna may be found across a more diverse physico-chemical range of groundwater systems than is commonly assumed. These results clearly demonstrate that general assumptions of habitat suitability should not be used to guide sampling activities.
The authors acknowledge the many organisations and individuals that contributed data, particularly unpublished data, to the Queensland Subterranean Aquatic Fauna database. The authors are grateful to the reviewer whose insights helped improve and refine this manuscript.
Biogeography of described families and genera of groundwater invertebrates in Queensland, Australia.
Data type: occurence
Explanation note: This dataset contains a supplementary table of described families and genera of groundwater invertebrates by higher rank in each subregion of Queensland, Australia.
Biogeography of undescribed families and/or genera of groundwater invertebrates in Queensland, Australia.
Data type: occurence
Explanation note: This dataset contains a supplementary table of undescribed families and/or genera of groundwater invertebrates by higher rank in each subregion of Queensland, Australia.