Research Article |
Corresponding author: Mara Knüsel ( mara.knuesel@eawag.ch ) Academic editor: Tiziana Di Lorenzo
© 2023 Ana Sofia Schneider, Mara Knüsel, Florian Altermatt.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Schneider AS, Knüsel M, Altermatt F (2023) Assessment of occurrence, diversity, and biomass of macroinvertebrates in Swiss groundwater systems using citizen science data. Subterranean Biology 46: 147-164. https://doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.46.112569
|
Groundwater is a vast ecosystem harboring a high diversity of specialized taxa. Despite its diversity, groundwater is a still relatively unexplored and threatened ecosystem. Especially the linkage of groundwater with other ecosystems remains largely unknown from the perspective of groundwater fauna. Here, we used citizen science data to get a first baseline knowledge of the occurrence, diversity, and biomass of major macroinvertebrate groups found in shallow groundwater systems of Switzerland. We investigated all organisms collected from the groundwater in 346 spring catchment boxes of municipal drinking water providers. We morphologically identified the organisms on a broad taxonomic level and estimated their biomass and pigmentation using automated image processing. Crustaceans, particularly Niphargus and groundwater isopods, were the most common taxa of obligate groundwater organisms. We also found a surprisingly high number of macroinvertebrates associated with surface and subsurface ecosystems. These taxa might be accidentally entering the groundwater or use it as temporary habitat. In both cases they possibly contribute essential allochthonous energy imports from the surface. We found a positive relationship between the estimated biomass of macroinvertebrates in the samples and the occurrence and abundance of Niphargus. Owing to the widespread occurrences of surface and subsurface macroinvertebrates in our groundwater samples, our study provides evidence for common interactions between groundwater, soil, and surface ecosystems.
Aquifers, hyporheic, pigmentation, stygofauna, subsidy, Switzerland
Groundwater harbors a unique and diverse fauna, yet is still an understudied ecosystem (
While attempts to develop ecological indicators for groundwater monitoring have been made (e.g.,
Along the hyporheic zone, water, dissolved oxygen, nutrients, organic matter, and organisms are exchanged between surface water and groundwater, creating environmental gradients along this transition area (
Drinking water aquifers and subsequent water collection in spring catchment boxes provide novel yet underexplored access to groundwater systems (
Here, we shed light on the diversity, occurrence, and biomass of macroinvertebrates found in Swiss groundwater systems and on the linkage to other surface and subsurface ecosystems. We used standardized groundwater samples retrieved from spring catchment boxes by local drinking water providers as part of a systematic Swiss-wide citizen science project. We measured the biomass of macroinvertebrates collected in groundwater to understand ecological processes between groundwater and surface ecosystems and its potential as resource influx. Additionally, we used the pigmentation of the macroinvertebrates as an approximate classification into hypogean and epigean fauna.
The samples were collected between 2021 and 2022 using a Swiss-wide, systematic citizen science approach. We collaborated with local drinking water providers, who sampled the groundwater flowing into spring catchment boxes (hereafter referred to as spring boxes) with filter nets (similar to
All macroinvertebrates were identified morphologically using a stereomicroscope (Nikon SMZ1500, 0.75–11.25×). We also identified exuviae and fragments of animals when the number of individuals could be inferred. Based on various identification resources (
We used automated image processing (ImageJ version 1.53t,
We standardized the bio-area and taxonomic abundances by the sampling duration and the volume of discharged groundwater (retrieved from the sampling protocol filled by the drinking water providers). Therefore, we calculated the bio-area of each site per 100 megaliters of discharged groundwater (1 ML = 1,000,000 liters). For the taxonomic abundances we standardized by 1,000 ML discharged groundwater per site. Based on the mean grey value of all organisms, we additionally split the standardized bio-area of each sample into light-pigmented (mean grey value above 111.86) and dark-pigmented (mean grey value below 111.86) bio-area. The threshold for the categorization was set based on the mean grey values of groundwater Isopoda (Asellidae, cf. Proasellus, unpigmented) specimens. All statistical analyses were performed based on the standardized data.
We extracted for each sampling site the aquifer type and tested if diversity, bio-area and pigmentation ratio varied between aquifer types. Therefore, we included the three dominant aquifer types present in Switzerland, namely fissured, karstic, and unconsolidated aquifers. The geodata for the aquifers was retrieved from
To test for a difference between the amounts of light- and dark-pigmented, standardized bio-area per sample, we used a paired Wilcoxon rank-sum test. For samples including both pigmentation categories, we additionally computed Kendall’s Tau to assess the correlation between the amounts of light- and dark-pigmented bio-area of the samples. We analyzed the effect of the bio-area on Niphargus occurrence with a generalized linear model (GLM), using a binomial error distribution. Twelve sites with a very high amount of bio-area (> 40,000 mm2 per 100 ML discharged groundwater) had a large impact on the results of the model and were thus removed from the analysis. To analyse the relationship between Niphargus abundance and macroinvertebrate bio-area, we compared three different models, that all accounted for zero-inflation, since Niphargus was not detected in 66.18% of the sampling sites. We applied two zero-inflated negative binomial (ZINB) models (with and without square-root-transformed response and explanatory variables) and a zero-inflated Poisson (ZIP) model, using the R function “zeroinfl()” from the package pscl (
All analyses were performed using RStudio version 2023.03.0+386 on R version 4.1.2 (
Using a citizen science approach, we obtained 1,182 standardized filter net samples collected by municipal drinking water providers from 346 spring boxes (Fig.
Sampling locations and macroinvertebrate occurrences A map of the main aquifer types in Switzerland (
Overall, 404 samples were empty and 778 samples contained a total of 5,578 macroinvertebrate individuals (including fragments and exuviae). Out of those, we identified 5,390 individuals belonging to 9 classes (Insecta, Malacostraca, Diplopoda, Chilopoda, Symphyla, Arachnida, Clitellata, Gastropoda, and Entognatha). 4,408 of those individuals were additionally identified to the order level. The remaining 188 individuals could not be identified.
Plecoptera (larva) and the two stygobiotic taxa Niphargus and groundwater Isopoda (Asellidae, cf. Proasellus, unpigmented) were the most abundant taxonomic groups. The least abundant taxon was Diplura (Suppl. material
When comparing the local macroinvertebrate diversity (Shannon index) and richness at the order level between aquifer types, a Kruskal-Wallis test revealed a statistically significant difference in local diversity (X2(2) = 6.54, p = 0.038) and richness (X2(2) = 15.04, p < 0.001) (Fig.
Local macroinvertebrate diversity at the order level per aquifer type A shannon Index (sites with at least one order included) B order richness (number of orders per site, all sites included), and C Pielou’s Evenness (sites with at least two orders included). The thick horizontal lines show the median, the interior of each box represents the interquartile range (IQR) and the vertical lines represent minima and maxima, respectively (1.5 * IQR). The number of sites included for each analysis is shown on top of each boxplot, as well as the significance level between groups (pairwise Wilcoxon rank-sum test with Bonferroni correction, ns for p > 0.05, * for p ≤ 0.05, ** for p ≤ 0.01, *** for p ≤ 0.001).
The amount of standardized macroinvertebrate bio-area ranged from 0 to 396,991 mm2 per 100 ML discharged groundwater. The median was 953 mm2 per 100 ML discharged groundwater. Using a Kruskal-Wallis test, we did not find any significant difference of the standardized bio-area between different aquifer types (X2(2) = 4.56, p = 0.10).
In total, 40% of the standardized macroinvertebrate bio-area sampled across all Switzerland was light-pigmented and 60% dark-pigmented. Based on the 271 sites where any bio-area was obtained, 67% of the sites had dark and light-pigmented bio-area, whereas 20% had dark-pigmented only and 13% light-pigmented bio-area only. The median amount of dark-pigmented standardized bio-area per sample was significantly higher than the median amount of light-pigmented area (paired Wilcoxon test, p < 0.05, Fig.
Standardized macroinvertebrate bio-area per site and pigmentation. Bio-area in mm2 per 100 ML discharged groundwater and at log10(y+1)-scale. The thick horizontal lines show the median, the interior of each box represents the interquartile range (IQR) and the vertical lines represent minima and maxima, respectively (1.5 * IQR).
Based on the standardized data, we compared the occurrence and abundance of Niphargus with the bio-area of other macroinvertebrates. There were 75 sites with empty samples (no Niphargus and no other macroinvertebrate bio-area) and 105 sites where both Niphargus and other macroinvertebrates were obtained. There were 154 sites without Niphargus but with other macroinvertebrates (bio-area of other macroinvertebrates > 0) and 12 sites where only Niphargus was detected (bio-area of other macroinvertebrates = 0). The binomial GLM showed a tendency for Niphargus occurrence to increase with increasing bio-area of other macroinvertebrates (Fig.
Niphargus occurrence in relation to the standardized bio-area of other macroinvertebrates. Predictions of binomial GLM are plotted as solid line with 95% confidence interval (shaded area). The binomial GLM was fitted to 334 sites with bio-area < 40,000 mm2/100 ML discharged groundwater. Bio-area in mm2 per 100 ML discharged groundwater.
Fit of the ZINB model for Niphargus abundance and the standardized bio-area of other macroinvertebrates. Both variables were square-root-transformed. Bio-area in mm2 per 100 ML discharged groundwater and Niphargus abundance per 1,000 ML discharged groundwater. For visualization, only points with values below 200 (x-axis) and 110 (y-axis) are plotted. The 95% confidence intervals are plotted in grey.
Here, we provide a first countrywide overview of major groups of macroinvertebrates found in Swiss groundwater systems and address possible associations between groundwater and surface ecosystems through the assessment of these organisms. While groundwater amphipods are relatively well-known for this area (
The application of a citizen science approach proved suitable to collect a broad range of macroinvertebrates from shallow groundwater aquifers. Collaborating with local drinking water providers to receive samples from spring boxes enabled us to obtain macroinvertebrates across a large geographic area, and from sampling sites that are otherwise not accessible to the public. In addition, the provided documentation on sampling duration and water discharge allowed highly standardized analyses of the samples. As such, it might be a suitable method to overcome the Racovitzan impediment (
In line with previous studies (e.g.,
The high abundances and widespread occurrences of macroinvertebrates from surface waters such as Plecoptera, Trichoptera, and Ephemeroptera larvae (EPT taxa), Gammarus, as well as groups containing aquatic organisms (e.g., Diptera and Coleoptera larvae) were surprising and could reflect surface water infiltration and the interactions between above- and below-ground ecosystems (
Local macroinvertebrate diversity and richness at the order level was significantly associated to the aquifer type. Unconsolidated aquifers had higher medians for diversity and richness compared to fissured aquifers. Similar observations have been made for example by
Aquifers are environments that lack photosynthetic primary production, and groundwater fauna relies largely on allochthonous energy sources imported from the surface (
Of all the standardized macroinvertebrate bio-area obtained, 40% was classified as light-pigmented, approximating the hypogean fauna (including stygobiotic and terrestrial subterranean organisms).This portion is in accordance with the expected low biomass of groundwater ecosystems based on the limited availability of resources (
We found a positive correlation between the macroinvertebrate bio-area and the occurrence and abundance of groundwater amphipods (Niphargus spp.). This could be due to local small-scale differences causing more organisms being washed out of the aquifers into the pipes at some sites. For example, differences in the porosity of the groundwater systems or differences in the construction of the water drainage infrastructure, such as pipe size or depth from which the pipes drain the aquifers might lead to a higher rate of organisms being washed out at spring boxes (see
Using citizen science samples collected by local drinking water providers, we identified major taxonomic groups of macroinvertebrates in shallow aquifers of Switzerland. Apart from obligate groundwater taxa, such as groundwater amphipods and isopods, we detected a substantial amount of macroinvertebrates associated with other surface and subsurface ecosystems. We also found a positive correlation between the macroinvertebrate biomass and the occurrence and abundance of groundwater amphipods, indicating a linkage between groundwater and other ecosystems. In particular, shallow aquifers might promote hydrological connectivity between surface water and groundwater. A better understanding of this linkage could help to conserve and manage groundwater ecosystems, especially as anthropogenic effects on surface ecosystems will affect groundwater ecosystems too.
We thank all participating water providers for collecting data for this project. Many thanks to Anouk Petitpierre, Ramona Petrig, and Jessica Colombo for their dedicated support in data acquisition. We thank Cene Fišer and his research group for exchange and discussions on Niphargus taxonomy. We would also like to thank Silvana Käser very much for helping with the macroinvertebrate identification, Nadine Locher for the laboratory work, as well as Roman Alther and Marjorie Couton for their advice during the project. Finally, we thank Denis Copilas-Ciocianu and Tiziana Di Lorenzo for their constructive and valuable comments on an earlier version of the manuscript.
Funding was provided by the Swiss Federal Office for the Environment FOEN/BAFU (project “AmphiWell” to FA and RA), the Swiss National Science Foundation (grants nr. PP00P3_150698 and 31BD30_209583 /Biodiverse DarCo to FA), and the University of Zurich Research Priority Program on Global Change and Biodiversity (URPP GCB to FA).
Bio-area and biomass relationship
Data type: pdf
Detailed procedure for macroinvertebrate bio-area measurements
Data type: pdf
Supplementary results
Data type: pdf