Research Article
Print
Research Article
An extraordinary colonial spider community in Sulfur Cave (Albania/Greece) sustained by chemoautotrophy*
expand article infoIstván Urák, Blerina Vrenozi§, Zofia Głąbiak|, Ninon Lecoquierre#, Cord Eiberger¤, Mark Maraun¤, Andrei Ştefan«», Jean-François Flot˄˅, Traian Brad«, Luisa Dainelli¦, Serban M. Sarbuˀˁ«, Raluca I. Băncilăˀ«
‡ Sapientia Hungarian University of Transylvania, Sfântu Gheorghe, Romania
§ University of Tirana, Tirana, Albania
| University of Maastricht, Maastricht, Netherlands
¶ Université libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
# Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
¤ University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
« Romanian Academy Cluj-Napoca Branch, Emil Racoviţă Institute of Speleology, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
» “Grigore Antipa” National Museum of Natural History, Bucharest, Romania
˄ Interuniversity Institute of Bioinformatics in Brussels - (IB)², Brussels, Belgium
˅ Brussels Laboratory of the Universe - BLU, Brussels, Belgium
¦ Gruppo Speleologico Archeologico Livornese of the Mediterranean Natural History Museum, Livorno, Italy
ˀ Emil Racoviţă Institute of Speleology, Biospeleology and Karst Edaphobiology Compartment, București, Romania
ˁ California State University, Chico, United States of America
Open Access

Abstract

We report the discovery and detailed analysis of an extraordinary colonial spider assemblage in Sulfur Cave, a chemoautotrophic sulfidic ecosystem located on the Albania-Greece border. The colony, comprising an estimated 69,000 individuals of Tegenaria domestica (Agelenidae) and more than 42,000 of Prinerigone vagans (Linyphiidae), spans a surface area of over 100 m²—representing the first documented case of colonial web formation in these species. Stable isotope analyses (δ¹³C and δ¹⁵N) revealed that the trophic web sustaining this assemblage is fueled by in situ primary production from sulfur-oxidizing microbial biofilms then transferred through chironomid larvae and adults to higher trophic levels. Morphological and molecular data confirmed the identity of the two spider species and revealed that their populations in Sulfur Cave are genetically distinct from other populations. Regarding T. domestica, we found a seasonal pattern in fecundity, with significantly larger egg clutches in early summer. Microbiome analysis of this species also revealed a lower Shannon diversity in the cave population compared with a surface individual captured nearby. Our findings unveil a unique case of facultative coloniality in this cosmopolitan spider, likely driven by resource abundance in a chemoautotrophic cave, and provide new insights into the adaptation and trophic integration of surface species in sulfidic subterranean habitats.

Keywords

food-web analysis, Prinerigone vagans, Sarandaporo Valley, stable isotope ratio analysis, Tegenaria domestica

Introduction

Sulfidic subterranean ecosystems are sustained by in situ primary production predominantly by chemoautotrophic sulfur-oxidizing microorganisms. These organisms utilize the hydrogen sulfide (H2S) as electron donor, and atmospheric dioxygen (O2) as terminal electron acceptor (Chen et al. 2009; Kumaresan et al. 2014). The resulting high amounts of autochthonous organic matter support abundant and diverse aquatic and terrestrial communities of invertebrates as well as a few vertebrate species (Engel 2007; Hutchins et al. 2016). Sulfidic cave ecosystems often harbor numerous endemic species (Brad et al. 2021; Sarbu et al. 2024), some of which exhibit physiological and biochemical adaptations allowing them to survive in highly selective environmental conditions such as H2S toxicity, hypoxia, and very low pH values (Flot et al. 2014; Tobler et al. 2016; Borko et al. 2019). The first chemoautotrophy-based groundwater ecosystem was discovered in Movile Cave in 1986 (Sarbu 1990; Sarbu et al. 1996). Subsequent investigations have revealed similar ecosystems in various locations, including the Frasassi caves (Italy; Sarbu et al. 2000), Ayyalon Cave (Israel; Por et al. 2013), Melissotrypa Cave (Greece; Popa et al. 2020), Tashan-Chah Kabootari Cave (Zagros Mountains, Iran; Malek-Hosseini et al. 2023), the Sharo-Argun cave system (Chechen Republic; Chervyatsova et al. 2020; Antić and Turbanov 2022), and more recently, several sulfidic caves in Albania (Benassi 2024; Sarbu et al. 2024; T. Delić, personal communication) within the Sarandaporo Valley, situated on the border between Greece and Albania (Audy et al. 2022; Kovařík et al. 2023; Sarbu et al. 2024).

Sulfur Cave is located at the border of two countries: its entrance is in Greece, while its deep sections are in Albania (Fig. 1). Along with Atmos Cave and Turtle Cave, it forms a hypogenic subterranean network of large rooms and passages lodged in a narrow limestone outcrop that was cut by the Sarandaporo River to form the Vromoner Canyon (Vromoner means “Smelly water” in Greek). Springs located in the deep recesses of the cave feed a sulfidic stream which flows through the entire length of the main cave passage and reaches the Sarandaporo River at the cave entrance. Its water displays a constant year-round temperature of 26 °C and a H2S concentration as high as 65 mg l-1 (Audy et al. 2022), and no seasonal or diurnal variations in flow rate were recorded for the cave stream. Occasional flooding events in the Sarandaporo River are only felt in the cave entrance area and appear to have limited effects on the cave ecosystem. The atmosphere in the cave can reach concentrations of up to 14 ppm of H2S (Audy et al. 2022). The sediments in the stream are covered by abundant white biofilms consisting of filamentous sulfur-oxidizing bacteria (e.g., Beggiatoa spp., Thiothrix spp.). The aquatic cave fauna in this stream is very abundant and includes oligochaetes, gastropods, chironomid larvae, coleoptera larvae and adults, and occasionally some fish. The terrestrial fauna is represented by numerous centipedes, terrestrial isopods, pseudoscorpions, mites, scorpions, spiders, springtails, chironomid adults, and beetles (Sarbu et al. 2024).

Figure 1. 

Plan of Sulfur Cave, with depiction of the main sulfidic springs (blue areas), and the large spider web in the vicinity of the cave entrance (brown areas) (modified from Audy et al. 2022 and Sarbu et al. 2024).

In the stream passage located close to the cave entrance, a dense swarm of adult chironomid flies fills the air in the immediate vicinity of the sulfidic stream, and a large portion of the cave wall is covered by a massive colonial spider web (Figs 1, 2).

Figure 2. 

The colonial spider web in Sulfur Cave, is home to a mixed colony of Tegenaria domestica and Prinerigone vagans. A. Side view; B. frontal view. The swarm of adult chironomids is visible near the cave stream. Photo A: Marek Audy.

The European subterranean spider fauna includes 512 species belonging to 20 families, with at least 192 species considered to be obligate troglobionts (Mammola et al. 2022). In Sulfur Cave, a large colonial spider web covering a significant portion of one of the cave walls was first reported by a team of speleologists from the Czech Speleological Society who explored the sulfidic caves of the Vromoner Canyon and collected samples of fauna (Audy et al. 2022). Taxonomic analysis by V. Ružička reported the presence of the following spider taxa in Sulfur Cave: Tegenaria domestica (Fourcroy, 1785) (Agelenidae), which was identified based solely on the examination of a few female specimens, Metellina merianae (Scopoli, 1763) (Tetragnathidae), Kryptonesticus eremita (Simon, 1880) (Nesticidae), and another unidentified nesticid species. Sarbu et al. (2024) subsequently identified the dominant spider species in the colony as Tegenaria domestica (Clerck, 1757) (Agelenidae) (Fig. 3), commonly known as the “Domestic House Spider” or “Barn Funnel Weaver”. A dense population of Prinerigone vagans (Andouin, 1826) (Linyphiidae) (Fig. 4) was also found co-inhabiting the colonial web.

Figure 3. 

Tegenaria domestica in Sulfur Cave. A Female next to a funnel shaped hole in the colonial spider web. B Female epigyne. C Male pedipalp with retrolateral view.

Figure 4. 

Prinerigone vagans in Sulfur Cave. Male and male pedipalp (right). Female and female epigyne (left).

Parasocial or colonial behavior (i.e., cooperation in web building by sharing the same spatial framework) has often been reported in subtropical and tropical arachnid communities. However, to date the only documented case of sub-social behavior in a cave-dwelling spider is that of Goeldia sp., observed by Almeida-Silva et al. (2009) in a Brazilian cave. This involved limited cooperative behavior and does not meet the criteria for true coloniality. Therefore, no confirmed cases of coloniality—defined by stable, large-scale cooperative web structures—have been reported among cave spiders (Mammola and Isaia 2017). Spider colonies, sometimes exceeding 100,000 individuals, are often correlated with locally high abundance of food resources (Rypstra 1979; Uetz 1983; Uetz and Hodge 1990; Uetz and Hieber 1997). Within Central Europe, the araneid spider Larinioides sclopetarius (Clerck 1757) is one of the few species known to form colonies with aggregations of 60 to 200 individuals across multiple generations building interconnected orb-webs (Schmitt 2004). Colonial behavior has never been observed in any agelenid or linyphiid spiders.

Food webs in caves are generally little studied since the trophic relationships between invertebrates and also between invertebrates and microorganisms are difficult to observe. One method to overcome those problems is the use of stable isotopes for understanding trophic levels in cave ecosystems. To analyze the trophic structure of cave animals and their food resources in Sulfur Cave, we therefore used stable isotope ratios of carbon (13C/12C) and nitrogen (15N/14N). These ratios are often used to analyze trophic levels in invertebrate communities (Maraun et al. 2023) as they integrate animal dietary information over longer periods of time, which allows to reveal general characteristics of the trophic structure of food webs (Tiunov 2007; Nielsen et al. 2018). As 13C is little enriched across trophic levels, it serves as an indicator for the base of the food web (Peterson and Fry 1987; Potapov et al. 2019a). In contrast, 15N is enriched by about three delta units per trophic level thereby reflecting the trophic position of consumers (Post 2002; Pollierer et al. 2009; Potapov et al. 2019b).

This study presents a detailed characterization of the remarkable spider colony discovered within Sulfur Cave, focusing on its spatial distribution and dimensions, species composition and population density, and the trophic resources sustaining this unique assemblage. We also documented aspects of reproductive biology (egg number and size) of the dominant species within the colonial web, and examined the presence and distribution of other spider species within Sulfur Cave to understand habitat partitioning and potentially distinct food web dynamics.

Materials and methods

Spider specimens were manually collected from both large and small webs throughout Sulfur Cave. Voucher specimens were preserved in 70% ethanol and deposited in the collection of the Museum of Natural Sciences, University of Tirana, Albania, and the zoological collection of the Department of Life Sciences, Sapientia Hungarian University of Transylvania, Romania. For stable isotope analysis samples of invertebrates and of microbial biofilms covering the aquatic sediments in the cave stream were collected manually and stored at –80 °C prior to analysis.

Morphological identification of spiders from Sulfur Cave

Spider external morphology, with a specific focus on male and female genitalia was examined using a ZEISS Stemi 2000-C and a Nikon SMZ1270 stereomicroscope. The taxonomic identification was based on the resources available at Spiders of Europe (Nentwig et al. 2025).

Images of the female epigyne and male pedipalp of T. domestica were taken using a Nikon D5600 DSLR camera mounted on a Nikon SMZ1270 stereomicroscope (Fig. 3B, C). The specimens of P. vagans were photographed using a Kern ODC 825 microscope camera attached to a Kern OZL 464 trinocular stereomicroscope. Images of the female epigyne and male pedipalp were taken using a Kern ODC 825 microscope camera mounted on a Kern OBN 132 trinocular optical microscope (Fig. 3). Multifocal images were compiled using HeliconFocus software, digital images were processed using Photoshop software.

Molecular identification of spiders from Sulfur Cave and haplotype analysis

The morphological characterization of the spiders was complemented by DNA barcoding. DNA was isolated from the prosoma or legs of specimens collected in absolute ethanol and kept at 4 °C using the QIAamp DNA Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) following the manufacturer’s instructions. For Tegenaria spiders, we amplified and sequenced Folmer’s fragment (COI) of the cytochrome c oxidase mitochondrial gene of 26 cave-collected individuals and 1 surface-collected individual (caught near the entrance of nearby Pixaria Cave) using the protocol described in Collard et al. (2025); Nanopore reads were subsequently assembled using amplicon_sorter (Vierstraete and Braeckman 2022). For the other spiders (namely, two specimens of Kryptonesticus, three specimens of Prinerigone, and two specimens of Metellina), a slightly shorter fragment of COI mitochondrial gene was amplified using the LCO1490 (5’-GGTCAACAAATCATAAAGATATTGG-3’; Folmer 1994) and chelicerate_reverse_2 (5’-GATGGCCAAAAAATCAAAATAAATG-3’; Barrett and Hebert 2005) primer pair. Those PCRs were performed in a 40 μL volume containing 1X Green GoTaq® Flexi Buffer (Promega, Madison, WI, USA), 2.5 mM MgCl2, 1X BSA, 0.1 mM dNTP, 1 U/μL GoTaq® Flexi DNA polymerase, 0.1 μM each primer and up to 10 ng/μL DNA. The cycling conditions consisted of an initial denaturation at 95 °C for 2 minutes followed by 5 cycles of denaturation at 94 °C for 40 seconds, annealing at 45 °C for 40 seconds, extension at 72 °C for 1 minute, 35 cycles of denaturation at 94 °C for 40 seconds, annealing at 51 °C for 40 seconds, extension at 72 °C for 1 minute and a final extension step at 72 °C for 5 minutes. Sanger sequencing was performed by Macrogen (Amsterdam, The Netherlands) and the resulting trace files were visually inspected and curated in Chromas v.2.6.6 (Technelysium Ltd., South Brisbane, Australia) and CodonCode Aligner v.3.7.1 (CodonCode Corporation, MA, USA). The resulting sequences were compared to the publicly available databases GenBank (Sayers et al. 2022) and Barcode of Life Data System (Ratnasingham and Hebert 2024). Sequences belonging to the same taxon or related taxa were downloaded and aligned on the MAFFT web server (Katoh et al. 2019; https://mafft.cbrc.jp/align-ment/server/index.html, accessed on the 29th of March 2025), sequence statistics and haplotype diversity (Hd) were estimated in DnaSP v.6 (Rozas et al. 2017) and haplotype networks were drawn in HaplowebMaker (Spöri and Flot 2020) using the median-joining algorithm (Bandelt et al. 1999).

16S metabarcoding analyses

As T. domestica is the dominant species in the communal web, our preliminary microbiome analysis has focused on this species. It included six individuals caught at the cave entrance, 13 individuals caught in the first section of the spider wall encountered when walking from the entrance into the cave, and 13 individuals caught in the second section of the spider wall (both on the left bank of the stream); as well as one surface individual caught near the entrance of Pixaria Cave, a few kilometers away, as a comparison. Whereas the first section of the Sulfur Cave spider wall is characterized by numerous egg sacs visible on the web, the second section is almost devoid of egg sacs, suggesting that reproduction chiefly occurs on the first section. Whole opisthosomas were used for DNA extraction, because the gut of spiders is not easy to separate from surrounding tissues. Although there are several organs located in the abdomen that contain microbial communities, the midgut is the largest one and it has been suggested in the literature that microbes associated with other organs do not influence the results significantly (see Kennedy et al. 2020 and references therein). DNA was extracted using the DNeasy PowerSoil Pro kit (Qiagen, UK), then 16S amplification and Nanopore sequencing was performed using the protocol described in Collard et al. (2025). The obtained reads were then analyzed in Emu (Curry et al. 2022) using its default database (Stoddard et al. 2015; O’Leary et al. 2016; Schoch et al. 2020).

Population density estimation of colony forming spiders and associated species

The density of the T. domestica population was estimated by counting individual funnel-shaped webs and then extrapolating these counts to the surface area occupied by the colony. A 15 × 15 cm quadrant was placed near the cave wall where the colony was present, at 30 randomly selected locations. At each location two high-resolution pictures were taken of each quadrat. The number of individual webs per quadrat, identified by the central funnel structure, including those overlapping the center of the web, was counted from the pictures. Note that this methodology is likely to slightly overestimate the total individual count in the colony, as some funnel webs may be abandoned/unoccupied. This survey was carried out in October 2023, April 2024 and March 2025. To calculate the surface area occupied by the colony, the length (L) and width (W) of the web-covered section of the wall were measured, and the area was computed using the formula: Area = L × W, assuming the colony forms an approximately rectangular patch. The P. vagans population density was estimated in March 2025 by counting individual spiders visible within 15 × 10 cm quadrants photographed at 30 random locations. The total estimated population size was extrapolated to half of the surface area determined for T. domestica, reflecting the observed spatial distribution pattern of P. vagans. The density of flies associated with the colony was estimated using a similar approach: individuals were counted within quadrats based on photographs, and the mean density was extrapolated to the total area occupied by the colony.

Reproductive biology of Tegenaria domestica - egg number and size analysis

A total of 86 egg sacs of T. domestica were collected from the surface of the colonial web during three sampling periods: June 2024 (n = 15), October 2024 (n = 40), and March 2025 (n = 31). Each egg sac was carefully opened using fine-tipped tweezers, and the number of eggs per clutch was recorded. Photographs were taken for further documentation. To assess egg size, 20 egg clutches were randomly selected, and three eggs from each clutch were measured using a Stage Micrometer Microscope calibrated to a precision of 0.01 mm.

Stable isotope analyses

For each species of invertebrate, a single individual was transferred into a tin capsule. Larger species were ground in a ball mill (Retsch Mixer Mill MM200, Haan, Germany), and 1–2 mg were weighed into the tin capsules. All samples were dried at 60 °C for 24 hours. Animal and biofilm samples were analyzed using a coupled system of an elemental analyzer (NA 1500, Carlo Erba, Milan, Italy) and a mass spectrometer (MAT 251, Finnigan, Bremen, Germany) adapted for the analysis of small sample sizes (Langel and Dyckmans 2014). Ratios of the heavy isotope to the light isotope (13C/12C, 15N/14N, denoted as R) were expressed in parts per thousand, relative to the standard using the delta notation with δ13C or δ15N = (Rsample/Rstandard -1) × 1000 (‰); Rsample and Rstandard being the respective target isotope ratio (15N/14N or 13C/12C, respectively). Vienna PD Belemnite limestone (V-PDB) and atmospheric nitrogen were used as standard for 13C and 15N, respectively. Acetanilide (C8H9NO, Merck, Darmstadt) was used for internal calibration. Details on the analysis are given in Reineking et al. (1993).

Statistical analyses

All statistical analyses were performed in R v.4.4.2 (R Core Team, 2024). To compare the number of eggs among sampling months, we conducted a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by Tukey’s Honest Significant Difference (HSD) post hoc test for pairwise comparisons. Graphical representations of the data were generated using the ggplot2 package v.2.3.5.2 (Wickham 2016). Tabular data files containing the sequences and associated metadata downloaded from the BOLD database were transformed using the dplyr package v.1.1.4 (Wickham et al. 2023) and the sequences were exported to fasta files using the dat2fasta function of the phylotools package v.0.2.2 (Zhang 2024). Finally, we calculated Shannon’s diversity index for the microbiome of cave- and surface-dwelling Tegenaria domestica individuals using a custom code.

Results

Using both morphological and molecular analyses, we identified five spider species in Sulfur Cave. These include one colony-forming species (Tegenaria domestica), one colony-associated species (Prinerigone vagans), and three additional non-colony-forming or non-colony-associated species: Metellina merianae (Scopoli, 1763) (Tetragnathidae) (Fig. 8), Lepthyphantes magnesiae Brignoli, 1979 (Linyphiidae), and Kryptonesticus eremita (Simon, 1880) (Nesticidae).

The molecular analysis showed that the sequence alignments for T. domestica (n = 72 sequences), K. eremita (n = 11 sequences), M. merianae (n = 47 sequences), P. vagans (n = 20 sequences) varied in length from 613 bp to 658 bp. Lepthyphantes magnesiae was excluded from the analyses due to the lack of publicly available COI sequence data for comparison. All the BOLD sequences used and their relevant metadata are provided in Suppl. material 1. The haplotype sequences generated in this study are deposited in GenBank under the accession numbers PV793491PV793494, PV793496 and PX363529.

The haplotype networks (Fig. 5) of T. domestica (Fig. 5A), K. eremita (Fig. 5B), and P. vagans (Fig. 5C) show distinct haplotypes for Sulfur Cave populations compared to sequences available online. Tegenaria domestica’s haplotype network (Hd = 0.321) is dominated by a central haplotype present in samples from North America, Europe, Turkey, Pakistan, and New Zealand. All 32 T. domestica samples from Sulfur Cave shared the same haplotype, one mutation away from this common haplotype that was also sampled a few kilometers away from Sulfur Cave (in the vicinity of Pixaria Cave).

Figure 5. 

Haplotype networks of COI sequences for four spider species from Sulfur Cave separated into individual panels A Tegenaria domestica B Kryptonesticus eremita C Prinerigone vagans D Metellina merianae. The haplotypes from Sulfur Cave are shown in yellow. The circle size is proportional to the number of sequences in each haplotype and the number of mutations between haplotypes are denoted by hash marks.

The haplotype network of K. eremita (Hd = 0.818) shows that the two cave individuals share a haplotype separated by three mutations from haplotypes found in Albania and Croatia. A similar situation is observed for P. vagans (Hd = 0.352); the three cave individuals sequenced shared the same haplotype, which is three mutations away from the common haplotype present in samples from France, Germany, Bulgaria, Egypt, Lebanon, and Pakistan. By contrast, M. merianae (Fig. 9D) presents a more complex, highly-reticulated haplotype network (Hd = 0.912) in which the two samples from Sulfur Cave belong to two distinct haplotypes, one of them shared with samples from Germany.

The spatial distribution of T. domestica in Sulfur Cave

The large spider colony in Sulfur Cave was mainly observed on the left bank of the sulfidic stream of Sulfur Cave, in a permanently dark zone, starting at approximately 50 m from the cave entrance. In this section of the cave, the passage is relatively narrow, and the ceiling is mostly low (Fig. 5). The location of the colonial spiderweb coincides with an area where an unusually dense swarm of small chironomid flies identified as Tanytarsus albisutus Santos Abreu, 1918 (a member of the triangularis group), hovering above the sulfidic stream that flows along the left cave wall.

Population density estimation of T. domestica and P. vagans

The estimated total surface area occupied by the spider colony was ~ 106 m2. Based on the extrapolated quadrat counts, the total population size of T. domestica was estimated at 69,113 spiders with the mean density of 652 ± 149 individuals per m2 (range: 178-2756). For P. vagans the estimated total number of individuals was 42,400, with a mean density of 823 ± 556 per m2 (range: 133-2200). The density of the chironomid flies resting on the cave wall was estimated at 45,500 individuals per m2. Based on this density and the observed spatial distribution pattern, where flies cover approximately half of surface area occupied by the spider colony, the total number of flies was extrapolated to be 2,414,440 individuals.

Reproductive biology (egg number and size) of T. domestica

The mean number of eggs per T. domestica clutch was 16.15 ± 0.62 SD (range: 6–33 eggs) with significant seasonal variations (ANOVA: F[2,83] = 69.42, p < 0.001). Tukey’s post hoc test showed that clutches collected in June (mean ± SD: 26 ± 3.12) contained significantly more eggs compared to those collected in October (14.5 ± 3.6) (mean difference: 11.550, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) = [8.966, 14.133], p < 0.001) and March (13 ± 3.73) (mean difference: 12.419, 95% CI = [9.735, 15.103], p < 0.001), while no significant difference was found between October and March (mean difference: 0.869, 95% CI = [-1.172–2.911], p = 0.569) (Fig. 6). The mean egg size was 0.53 ± 0.05 mm, with values ranging from 0.4 to 0.6 mm.

Figure 6. 

Monthly variation in the number of eggs per egg sac in Tegenaria domestica.

Food-web analysis

The δ¹⁵N and δ¹³C values in adult Tanytarsus albisutus (Diptera, Chironomidae), as well as in both agelenid and linyphiid spiders inhabiting the colony, ranged from −2‰ to −10‰, in contrast to conspecifics or ecologically similar surface-dwelling taxa, which showed values between 1‰ and 4‰ (Fig. 7).

Figure 7. 

Mean (+ standard deviation) of δ13C and δ15N values of four spider species (Tegenaria domestica, Metellina merianae, Prinerigone vagans, Lepthyphantes magnesiae, Araneae), their potential food resource (the non-biting midge Tanytarsus albisutus) and the basal food resource (biofilm) of the cave food web in Sulfur Cave located at the border between Albania and Greece (animal drawings by Svenja Meyer). ‘Surface spiders’ include representatives of the families Lycosidae, Salticidae, and Pholcidae.

Microbiomes of cave- and surface-dwelling T. domestica

In the one surface individual of T. domestica analyzed (collected near Pixaria Cave), we detected 30 different bacterial genera. By contrast, the microbiome of T. domestica from Sulfur Cave showed a much lower bacterial diversity (Fig. 8). The mean Shannon diversity index was 0.82 for Sulfur Cave individuals (standard deviation: 0.25), in contrast to 2.99 for the surface-dwelling individual. A large proportion of the bacterial reads in Sulfur Cave individuals originated from intracellular symbionts, primarily Mycoplasmopsis, Mycoplasma, and Wolbachia.

Figure 8. 

Comparison of the Shannon diversity index of the microbiome of the opisthosoma of one surface individual of Tegenaria domestica caught near Pixaria Cave vs. 29 individuals of the same species from Sulfur Cave (three Sulfur Cave individuals with insufficient number of reads were excluded from the analysis). S0 individuals were caught at the entrance of Sulfur Cave, S1 on the first section of the spider wall and S2 and the second section.

Discussion

The spider colony

We report the discovery and detailed analysis of an extraordinary colonial spider assemblage in Sulfur Cave. Morphological examinations and molecular analyses identified Tegenaria domestica as being responsible for weaving the enormous colonial web. Prinerigone vagans (Andouin, 1826), a small linyphiid spider, was also observed co-habiting the web of the much larger agelenids. The colony covers a surface area of over 100 m² and represents the first documented case of colonial web formation in these species, comprising an estimated 69,000 individuals of T. domestica and more than 42,000 of P. vagans. The methodology used to estimate spider density may lead to an overestimation due to the presence of abandoned funnel webs that are difficult to distinguish from those in use.

Tegenaria domestica is a cosmopolitan species with a global distribution (Nentwig et al. 2025; World Spider Catalog 2025). It is a nocturnal and synanthropic spider usually found close to human habitations, such as in buildings, under stones, in dark recesses, i.e. closets and basements, with adults present year-around (Nentwig et al. 2025). While frequently found in caves across Europe (Mammola et al. 2018, 2022) and considered a characteristic species for Balkan caves (Bristowe 1958; Deltshev et al. 2011), prior literature did not describe T. domestica exhibiting gregarious behavior and forming large colonial webs. The species typically builds a web resembling an open-cut funnel, with a tubular retreat open on both ends and its edge widening on one side to form a sheet-like capture surface (Nentwig et al. 2024). On a close examination, the large colonial web appears to be the result of joining numerous individual funnel-shaped webs, each strategically positioned in a spot of abundant trophic resource availability. Sections of the web may detach from the wall under their own weight. The colonization of Sulfur Cave by T. domestica was most likely driven by the abundant food resources represented by the dense swarm of chironomids thriving in the cave.

Prinerigone vagans, the co-habiting spider species within the colony, apparently did not elicit a predatory response from T. domestica. We hypothesize that the absence of light impairs the visual detection capabilities of T. domestica, rendering the small P. vagans inconspicuous, particularly given P. vagans stationary ambush predatory strategy with brief movements when prey items are in close proximity within the web. Although we did not conduct a specific study to quantify seasonal variations, our observations indicate no discernible changes in the species composition and abundance of the two spider species that co-habit the large colony in Sulfur Cave. Comparable densities of these spiders were observed throughout the year during our field trips in May, June, and November 2023, in April, July, and October 2024, and in March 2025. Sustaining a predator colony of this size inside a cave requires a substantial and consistent supply of food and this is unlikely to be met solely by allochthonous resources from the surface, where resources become rather scarce during the cold season.

Other spider species in Sulfur Cave

Metellina merianae (Scopoli, 1763) (Tetragnathidae) (Fig. 9) has been previously reported from Sulfur Cave (Audy et al. 2022). The juveniles prey upon collembola, while the adults feed on the two species of chironomids: the Tanytarsus albisutus and the larger Chironomus riparius (Meigen, 1804), mostly present in the deeper sections of the cave. M. merianae builds solitary orb webs and was not observed within the colonial web, yet it is quite abundant in close proximity to the colony where the dense chironomid swarm occurs. Specimens observed close to the colonial web appear to exhibit larger body size, presumably due to the readily available and abundant food resources. However, this species was observed throughout the cave, including the areas covered by gypsum crusts that appear rather dry. As a troglophile species (Mammola et al. 2018, 2022, Nentwig et al. 2025), M. merianae appears to be versatile and able to adapt to both wet and dry cave habitats.

Figure 9. 

Metellina merianae. Female (left) and male (right) in individual webs on the cave wall.

Lepthyphantes magnesiae Brignoli, 1979 (Araneae: Linyphiidae) was observed on the cave wall opposite the colonial web. It builds individual webs and it shares the habitat with a pseudoscorpion species belonging to the genus Neobisium. Both these predator species have been noticed in the humid areas at the base of walls, where they appear to feed on collembola and chironomid flies. Lepthyphantes magnesiae is considered a rare species endemic to the Balkan Peninsula.

In the deep recesses of the cave, far from the cave entrance and the colonial web, two additional web-building spider species were also observed: Kryptonesticus eremita (Simon, 1880) (Nesticidae), previously reported from Sulfur Cave by Audy et al. (2022), and a very small, blind, and depigmented species of Cataleptoneta (Leptonetidae). Both K. eremita and Cataleptoneta sp. were present in large numbers but were spatially limited to areas where the cave walls were moist and free of gypsum crusts.

Genetic and geographic patterns of spider species in Sulfur Cave

Haplotype networks revealed both similarities and contrasts among the spider species found in Sulfur Cave. For T. domestica, K. eremita, and P. vagans, the cave individuals shared distinct haplotypes not found in broader regional datasets, though all were closely related, i.e. within three mutations, to widespread haplotypes from Europe, the Middle East, or Asia. In contrast, M. merianae showed a more complex and reticulated haplotype network, with two individuals from Sulfur Cave belonging to different haplotypes, one shared with German samples. Despite the geographical proximity of some samples to Sulfur Cave (e.g. from Slovenia, Bulgaria, North Macedonia), they were quite distant in the network. This suggests that M. merianae is both more geographically mobile and more genetically diverse than the other spider species found in Sulfur Cave.

Reproductive biology of T. domestica

The reproductive effort, measured as the number of eggs per sac, differed from values reported in the literature for surface-dwelling conspecifics. Females of T. domestica are known to lay six to eight egg sacs at an interval of 20–25 days, with the first cocoon containing up to 100 eggs, followed by smaller successive clutches (Trabalon et al. 1992). Numerous egg-sacks were observed in the large spider web, but their number was not estimated as the multi-layered web made it impossible to count the egg clutches. The underlying factors contributing to a potential reduction in clutch size in the Sulfur Cave population of this species are yet to be determined, although environmental factors such as perpetual darkness and sulfidic conditions have been shown to be associated with reduced fecundity and increased offspring size (Riesch et al. 2010).

Microbiomes of cave- and surface-dwelling T. domestica

At the microbiome level, we found that, by contrast to one surface-dwelling individual of T. domestica, collected in the vicinity of the cave, in which approximately 30 different bacterial genera were detected, the cave-dwelling individuals investigated exhibited markedly lower bacterial diversity. In these individuals a large proportion of the reads originated from intracellular bacterial symbionts, such as Mycoplasmopsis, Mycoplasma and Wolbachia. Although the results are quite preliminary and do not allow to distinguish the relative contributions of the various parts of the opisthosoma to the measured diversity, it suggests that the population of T. domestica from Sulfur Cave presents a much-reduced microbial diversity than surface ones.

Alternate food web in Sulfur Cave

Preliminary observations indicate that in the deep cave sections, the food web is based on chemosynthetic carbon fixation in terrestrial microbial biofilms that cover the moist cave walls. These biofilms consist of sulfur-oxidizing microorganisms (unpublished). Numerous specimens of Graeconiscus sp. (Isopoda, Trichoniscidae) and dense populations of collembola appear to feed on this cave-wall microbiome, forming the base of a food web that supports two species of spiders and other small terrestrial predators such as centipedes, pseudoscorpions, mites, and beetles (Sarbu et al. 2024).

Conclusions

Similarly to other sulfidic subterranean ecosystems based on autochthonous food production by chemoautotrophic microorganisms, Sulfur Cave in the Vromoner Canyon located on the border between Greece and Albania contains exceptionally abundant and diverse invertebrate communities that thrive in total darkness. The most impressive occurrence in this cave is a large colonial spider web that covers an estimated 100 m2 of cave wall and hosts ~69,000 specimens of T. domestica and ~42,000 specimens of P. vagans. These are both surface species that have never been reported to form colonies, and molecular evidence suggests that the Sulfur Cave population does not exchange individuals with the surface. Preliminary analyses of the microbiome of T. domestica also suggest that the cave population of this species is isolated from surface ones and presents a depauperate microbial diversity.

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to Mihai Hristescu, Ruxandra Nițescu, Marius Kenesz, Norm Rosene, Alexandru Crînguș, Geza Zakarias, Claire Chauveau, Olivier Collard, Sarah Flot, Alice Salussolia, Maria Fotiadi, Andreea-Rebeka Zsigmond, Andrei Sarbu, and many others who helped with the field work. The taxonomic identifications were performed by Elisabeth Stur and Torbjørn Ekrem (Chironomidae), Bernhard Klausnitzer (Scirtidae), George Popovici (Pseudoscorpiones), and Victor Fet (Scorpiones). Special thanks to Susanne Boening for help during sample preparation for stable isotope measurements and to Svenja Meyer for the animal drawings in Fig. 7. Special thanks to Ingmar Weiss for his useful insights and for his help during the preparation of the manuscript. This research is a vital part of the initiative: “Conservation of the Unique Cave Ecosystems of Aoos-Vjosa River Basin” and the project received EuroSpeleo protection label status and was supported by FSE for 2025.

This research was funded by Biodiversa+, the European Biodiversity Partnership under the 2021–2022 BiodivProtect joint call for research proposals, co-funded by the European Commission (GA N°101052342) and with the funding organizations Ministry of Universities and Research (Italy), Agencia Estatal de Investigación – Fundación Biodiversidad (Spain), Fundo Regional para a Ciência e Tecnologia (Portugal), Suomen Akatemia – Ministry of the Environment (Finland), Belgian Science Policy Office (Belgium), Agence Nationale de la Recherche (France), Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft e.V. (Germany), Schweizerischer Nationalfonds (Grant N° 31BD30_209583, Switzerland), Fonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (Austria), Ministry of Higher Education, Science and Innovation (Slovenia), and the Executive Agency for Higher Education, Research, Development and Innovation Funding (Romania). We also thank Stefan Scheu from the University of Göttingen for financial support for the stable isotope measurements. J.F.F. ‘s fieldwork was supported by a FNRS mobility grant, and open access publication fees were covered by ‘Projet de Recherches’ grant no. T.0078.23 to J.F.F.

References

  • Antić D, Turbanov IS (2022) An unexpected new cave-dwelling species of the genus Leucogeorgia Verhoeff, 1930 (Diplopoda: Julida: Julidae) from the Chechen Republic, Caucasus, Russia. Arthropoda Selecta 31: 375–383. https://doi.org/10.15298/arthsel.31.4.01
  • Audy M, Bouda R, Bruthans J, Ružička V (2022) Albanian hypogene caves in the area of Vromoner thermal springs on the Sarandoporo River. Speleoforum 41: 41–51.
  • Benassi A (2024) Lengarices 2023. Inseguendo il soffio del Drago (Albania), Speleologia SSI 89: 4–6.
  • Borko Š, Collette M, Brad T, Zakšek V, Flot J-F, Vaxevanopoulos M, Sarbu SM, Fišer C (2019) Amphipods in a Greek cave with sulphidic and non-sulphidic water: phylogenetically clustered and ecologically divergent. Systematics and Biodiversity 17: 558–572. https://doi.org/10.1080/14772000.2019.1670273
  • Brad T, Iepure S, Sarbu SM (2021) The chemoautotrophically based Movile Cave groundwater ecosystem, a hotspot of subterranean biodiversity. Diversity 13: 128, https://doi.org/10.3390/d13030128
  • Bristowe WS (1958) The World of Spiders. Collins New Naturalist, London, 304 pp.
  • Chen Y, Wu L, Boden R, Hillebrand A, Kumaresan D, Moussard H, Baciu M, Lu Y, Colin Murrell J (2009) Life without light: microbial diversity and evidence of sulfur- and ammonium-based chemolithotrophy in Movile Cave. The ISME Journal 3: 1093–1104. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2009.57
  • Chervyatsova OY, Potapov SS, Kuzmina LY, Dublyansky YV, Sadykov SA, Kiseleva DV, Okuneva TG, Dzhabrailov S-EM, Samokhin GV (2020) Sulfuric acid speleogenesis in the North Caucasus: Sharo-Argun valley Caves (Chechen Republic, Russia). Geomorphology 369: 107346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2020.107346
  • Collard O, Tawfeeq MM, Ducret H, Flot J-F (2025) A rapid and inexpensive universal PCR protocol for DNA (meta)barcoding using a one-tube, 2-step PCR. bioRxiv: 2025.05.16.654411. https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.05.16.654411
  • Curry KD, Wang Q, Nute MG, Tyshaieva A, Reeves E, Soriano S, Wu Q, Graeber E, Finzer P, Mendling W, Savidge T, Villapol S, Dilthey A, Treangen TJ (2022) Emu: species-level microbial community profiling of full-length 16S rRNA Oxford Nanopore sequencing data. Nature Methods 19: 845–853. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-022-01520-4
  • Deltshev C, Vrenozi B, Blagoev G, Lazarov S (2011) Spiders of Albania – faunistic and zoogeographical review (Arachnida: Araneae). Acta Zoologica Bulgarica 63(2): 125–144.
  • Engel AS (2007) Observations on the biodiversity of sulfidic karst habitats. Journal of Cave and Karst Studies 69: 187–206.
  • Folmer O, Black M, Hoeh W, Lutz R, Vrijenhoek R (1994) DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I from diverse metazoan invertebrates. Molecular Marine Biology and Biotechnology 3: 294–299.
  • Flot J-F, Bauermeister J, Brad T, Hillebrand-Voiculescu A, Sarbu SM, Dattagupta S (2014) Niphargus-Thiothrix associations may be widespread in sulphidic groundwater ecosystems: evidence from southeastern Romania. Molecular Ecology 23: 1405–1417. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.12461
  • Hutchins BT, Engel AS, Nowlin WH, Schwartz BF (2016) Chemolithoautotrophy supports macroinvertebrate food webs and affects diversity and stability in groundwater communities. Ecology 97: 1530–1542. https://doi.org/10.1890/15-1129.1
  • Kennedy SR, Tsau S, Gillespie R, Krehenwinkel H (2020) Are you what you eat? A highly transient and prey-influenced gut microbiome in the grey house spider Badumna longinqua. Molecular Ecology 29: 1001–1015. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.15370
  • Kovařík F, Audy M, Sarbu SM, Fet V (2023) , Euscorpius sulfur sp. n. (Scorpiones: Euscorpiidae), a new cave scorpion from Albania and northwestern Greece. Euscorpius 376: 1–14.
  • Langel R, Dyckmans J (2014) Combined 13C and 15N isotope analysis on small samples using a near-conventional elemental analyzer/isotope ratio mass spectrometer setup. Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry 28: 1019–1022. https://doi.org/10.1002/rcm.6878
  • Kumaresan D, Wischer D, Stephenson J, Hillebrand-Voiculescu A, Murrell JC (2014) Microbiology of Movile Cave - A chemolithoautotrophic ecosystem. Geomicrobiology Journal 31: 186–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490451.2013.839764
  • Malek-Hosseini M, Brad T, Fatemi Y, Kuntner M, Fišer C (2023) A new cave-dwelling hadzioid amphipod (Senticaudata, Hadzioidea, Melitidae) from sulfidic groundwaters in Iran, Contributions to Zoology 93: 107–126. https://doi.org/10.1163/18759866-bja10054
  • Mammola S, Cardoso P, Ribera C, Pavlek M, Isaia M (2018) A synthesis on cave-dwelling spiders in Europe. Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research 56(3): 301–316. https://doi.org/10.1111/jzs.12201
  • Mammola S, Pavlek M, Huber BA, Isaia M, Ballarin F, Tolve M, Čupić I, Hesselberg T, Lunghi E, Mouron S, Graco-Roza C, Cardoso P (2022) A trait database and updated checklist for European subterranean spiders. Scientific Data 9: 236. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-022-01316-3
  • Maraun M, Thomas T, Fast E, Treibert N, Caruso T, Schaefer I, Lu J-Z, Scheu S (2023) New perspectives on soil animal trophic ecology through the lens of C and N stable isotope ratios of oribatid mites. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 177: 108890. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2022.108890
  • Nentwig W, Ansorg J, Cushing PE, Kranz-Baltensperger Y, Kropf C (2024) Funnel-web spiders (Agelenidae). In: Nentwig W, Ansorg J, Cushing PE, Kranz-Baltensperger Y, Kropf C (Eds) House Spiders - Worldwide. Springer Nature Switzerland, Cham, 45–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-70448-2_5
  • O’Leary NA, Wright MW, Brister JR, Ciufo S, Haddad D, McVeigh R, Rajput B, Robbertse B, Smith-White B, Ako-Adjei D, Astashyn A, Badretdin A, Bao Y, Blinkova O, Brover V, Chetvernin V, Choi J, Cox E, Ermolaeva O, Farrell CM, Goldfarb T, Gupta T, Haft D, Hatcher E, Hlavina W, Joardar VS, Kodali VK, Li W, Maglott D, Masterson P, McGarvey KM, Murphy MR, O’Neill K, Pujar S, Rangwala SH, Rausch D, Riddick LD, Schoch C, Shkeda A, Storz SS, Sun H, Thibaud-Nissen F, Tolstoy I, Tully RE, Vatsan AR, Wallin C, Webb D, Wu W, Landrum MJ, Kimchi A, Tatusova T, DiCuccio M, Kitts P, Murphy TD, Pruitt KD (2016) Reference sequence (RefSeq) database at NCBI: current status, taxonomic expansion, and functional annotation. Nucleic Acids Research 44: D733–D745. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkv1189
  • Pollierer MM, Langel R, Scheu S, Maraun M (2009) Compartmentalization of the soil animal food web as indicated by dual analysis of stable isotopes (15N/14N and 13C/12C). Soil Biology and Biochemistry 41: 1221–1226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2009.03.002
  • Popa I, Brad T, Vaxevanopoulos M, Giurginca A, Baba Ș, Iepure S, Plăiașu R, Sarbu SM (2020) Rich and diverse subterranean invertebrate communities inhabiting Melissotrypa Cave in Central Greece. Travaux de l’Institut de Spéologie Émile Racovitza 58: 65–78.
  • Por F, Dimentman C, Frumkin A, Naaman I (2013) Animal life in the chemoautotrophic ecosystem of the hypogenic groundwater cave of Ayyalon (Israel): A summing up. Natural Science 5: 7–13. https://doi.org/10.4236/ns.2013.54A002
  • Potapov AM, Tiunov AV, Scheu S (2019) Uncovering trophic positions and food resources of soil animals using bulk natural stable isotope composition. Biological Reviews 94: 37–59. https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12434
  • R Core Team (2024) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/
  • Ratnasingham S, Wei C, Chan D, Agda J, Agda J, Ballesteros-Mejia L, Boutou HA, El Bastami ZM, Ma E, Manjunath R, Rea D, Ho C, Telfer A, McKeowan J, Rahulan M, Steinke C, Dorsheimer J, Milton M, Hebert PDN (2024) BOLD v4: A centralized bioinformatics platform for DNA-based biodiversity data. In: DeSalle R (Ed.) DNA Barcoding: Methods and Protocols. Springer US, New York, NY, 403–441. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-3581-0_26
  • Reineking A, Langel R, Schikowski J (1993) 15N, 13C-On-line measurements with an elemental analyser (Carlo Erba, NA 1500), a modified trapping box and a gas isotope mass spectrometer (Finnigan, MAT 251). Isotopenpraxis Isotopes in Environmental and Health Studies 29: 169–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/10256019308046151
  • Riesch R, Plath M, Schlupp I (2010) Toxic hydrogen sulfide and dark caves: life-history adaptations in a livebearing fish (Poecilia mexicana, Poeciliidae). Ecology 91: 1494–1505. https://doi.org/10.1890/09-1008.1
  • Rozas J, Ferrer-Mata A, Sánchez-DelBarrio JC, Guirao-Rico S, Librado P, Ramos-Onsins SE, Sánchez-Gracia A (2017) DnaSP 6: DNA Sequence Polymorphism Analysis of Large Data Sets. Molecular Biology and Evolution 34: 3299–3302. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msx248
  • Rypstra AL (1979) Foraging flocks of spiders (a study of aggregate behaviour in Cyrtophora citricola in West Africa). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 5: 291–300. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00293677
  • Sarbu SM (1990) The unusual fauna of a cave with thermomineral waters containing H2S from Southern Dobrogea, Romania. Mémoires de Biospéologie 17: 191–195.
  • Sarbu SM, Galdenzi S, Menichetti M, Gentile G (2000) Geology and biology of the Frasassi caves in Central Italy: An ecological multi-disciplinary study of a hypogenic underground karst system. In: Wilkens H, Culver DC, Humphreys WF (Eds) Ecosystems of the world: Subterranean Ecosystems. Elsevier, 359–378.
  • Sarbu SM, Brad T, Băncilă RI, Ştefan A (2024) Exploring biodiversity and food webs in Sulfur Cave in the Vromoner Canyon on the Greek-Albanian Border, Diversity 16: 477. https://doi.org/10.3390/d16080477
  • Sayers EW, Bolton EE, Brister JR, Canese K, Chan J, Comeau DC, Connor R, Funk K, Kelly C, Kim S, Madej T, Marchler-Bauer A, Lanczycki C, Lathrop S, Lu Z, Thibaud-Nissen F, Murphy T, Phan L, Skripchenko Y, Tse T, Wang J, Williams R, Trawick BW, Pruitt KD, Sherry ST (2022) Database resources of the national center for biotechnology information. Nucleic Acids Research 50: D20–D26. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkab1112
  • Schoch CL, Ciufo S, Domrachev M, Hotton CL, Kannan S, Khovanskaya R, Leipe D, Mcveigh R, O’Neill K, Robbertse B, Sharma S, Soussov V, Sullivan JP, Sun L, Turner S, Karsch-Mizrachi I (2020) NCBI Taxonomy: a comprehensive update on curation, resources and tools. Database 2020: baaa062. https://doi.org/10.1093/database/baaa062
  • Spöri Y, Flot J-F (2020) HaplowebMaker and CoMa: Two web tools to delimit species using haplowebs and conspecificity matrices. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 11: 1434–1438. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.13454
  • Stoddard SF, Smith BJ, Hein R, Roller BRK, Schmidt TM (2015) rrnDB: improved tools for interpreting rRNA gene abundance in bacteria and archaea and a new foundation for future development. Nucleic Acids Research 43: D593–D598. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gku1201
  • Tobler M, Passow CN, Greenway R, Kelley JL, Shaw JH (2016) The evolutionary ecology of animals inhabiting hydrogen sulfide-rich environments. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 47: 239–262. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-121415-032418
  • Trabalon M, Bautz AM, Moriniere M, Porcheron P (1992) Ovarian development and correlated changes in hemolymphatic ecdysteroid levels in two spiders, Coelotes terrestris and Tegenaria domestica (Araneae, Agelenidae). General and Comparative Endocrinology 88(1): 128–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-6480(92)90201-T
  • Uetz GW (1983) Sociable spiders. Natural History 92: 62–79.
  • Uetz GW, Hodge MA (1990) Influence of habitat and prey availability on spatial organization and behavior of colonial web-building spiders. National Geographic Research 6: 22–40.
  • Uetz GW, Hieber CS (1997) Colonial web-building spiders: balancing the costs and benefits of group-living. In: Crespi BJ, Choe JC (Eds) , The Evolution of Social Behaviour in Insects and Arachnids. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 458–475. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511721953.023
  • Vierstraete AR, Braeckman BP (2022) Amplicon_sorter: A tool for reference-free amplicon sorting based on sequence similarity and for building consensus sequences. Ecology and Evolution 12: e8603. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.8603

* Topical Collection: "DarCo: Filling knowledge gaps for European subterranean biodiversity towards its effective conservation", edited by Stefano Mammola, Fabio Stoch.

Supplementary material

Supplementary material 1 

BOLD sequences used within this study

Andrei Ştefan

Data type: xlsx

This dataset is made available under the Open Database License (http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/). The Open Database License (ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this Dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(s) are credited.
Download file (16.04 kb)
login to comment