Research Article |
Corresponding author: Sopark Jantarit ( fugthong_dajj@yahoo.com ) Academic editor: Shalva Barjadze
© 2021 Areeruk Nilsai, Matsapume Detcharoen, Nerivania Nunes Godeiro, Sopark Jantarit.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Nilsai A, Detcharoen M, Godeiro NN, Jantarit S (2021) Four new species of troglomorphic Coecobrya Yosii, 1956 (Collembola, Entomobryidae) from Thailand based on morphological and molecular evidence, with an updated key of Thai troglomorphic species. Subterranean Biology 41: 1-42. https://doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.41.76926
|
Four new species of troglomorphic Coecobrya Yosii, 1956 are described from caves located in the central and northeastern regions of Thailand. Coecobrya whitteni sp. nov. and C. troglobia sp. nov. are from Khon Kaen province, C. ellisi sp. nov. is from Phetchabun province and C. phitsanulokensis sp. nov. is from Phitsanulok province. They all exhibit remarkable troglobitic characters i.e. elongated antennae, legs and furca, slender claw complex and large body size. Coecobrya whitteni sp. nov. is similar to C. troglobia sp. nov. and they were found a distance of only 3.4 km from each other. However, they are mainly different in the number of An mac on dorsal head and number of chaetae of Th. II. Likewise, C. ellisi sp. nov. is similar to C. phitsanulokensis sp. nov.. However, they differ in the number of An mac on the dorsal head, the number of central mac on Abd. II, central mac on Abd. IV, lateral mac on Abd. IV and the number of inner teeth of the claw. Moreover, C. ellisi sp. nov. has orange pigment dots on the body, a unique character, considering that all other troglomorphic Coecobrya species in Thailand are devoid of pigmentation. The results of the molecular approach based on two partial mitochondrial markers (COI and 16S rDNA) and a nuclear gene fragment (28S rDNA) supported the results of morphological species discrimination in separating the four nominal populations as valid species. An updated dichotomous key of Thai troglomorphic Coecobrya species is also given.
DNA barcoding, Entomobryinae, molecular phylogeny, subterranean habitat, troglomorphy
The subterranean genus Coecobrya Yosii, 1956 is globally distributed, especially in Japan, southern China and Thailand (
In Thailand, the genus Coecobrya is common and widespread throughout the country, especially in cave environments. So far 15 species (21 % of the worldwide total) are reported from the country, of which 13 species are found exclusively in cave habitats. The majority of them (11 species) are described from caves in the southern region and have a narrow range of dispersion. They are: C. cavicta Nilsai & Zhang, 2017; C. chumphonensis Zhang & Nilsai, 2017; C. donyoa Zhang & Jantarit, 2018; C. khaopaela Zhang & Jantarit, 2018; C. khromwanaramica Zhang, 2018; C. polychaeta Zhang & Nilsai, 2017; C. phanthuratensis Zhang & Jantarit, 2018; C. promdami Zhang & Jantarit, 2018; C. ranongica Nilsai & Zhang, 2018; C. sirindhornae Jantarit, Satasook & Deharveng, 2019; C. specusincola Zhang & Nilsai, 2018 (
Troglomorphic characters in the Collembola are elongated appendages (antennae, legs and furca), elongated and slender claw complex, pointed tenent hair, large body size, multiplication of antennal chaetae, blindness and depigmentation (
During our sampling surveys in the limestone caves of Thailand several troglomorphic, occasionally highly troglomorphic, Coecobrya species were seen and collected in several areas of Thailand. Four of them are described in this work and they were found exclusively in caves of the central region (Phetchabun and Phitsanulok provinces) and in the western part of the northeastern region in Khon Kaen province. They are therefore the first described cave Coecobrya species from the central and northeastern regions of Thailand. In the last part of this work an updated key of the Thai troglomorphic Coecobrya species is also given.
Specimens were collected with entomological aspirators and stored in 95% ethanol. They were later kept in a freezer at –20 °C. Specimens were cleared in Nesbitt solution, heated at 60 °C for 1–2 minutes, before mounting on glass slides using Marc André II solution. Morphological characters were examined using an Olympus BX 51 microscope with phase-contrast and a drawing tube. Illustrations were enhanced with Adobe Illustrator CC/PC for Windows (Adobe Inc.). Photographs were taken with a Canon 5D digital camera using a Canon MP-E 65 mm Macro Photo Lens and Canon Extender EF 2.0× III (Canon, Tokyo, Japan) and a Stack-Shot Macrorail (Cognisys Inc, MI, USA). Photos were then combined in Helicon Focus 6.8.0 (Helicon Soft, Ukraine). The map was taken and modified from Mitrearth (http://www.mitrearth.org/). Photographs were improved later using Adobe Photoshop CC/PC for Windows (Adobe Inc.).
The DNA of each individual was isolated from the whole body using a DNeasy Tissue Extraction Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany), following the manufacturer’s protocols. Fragments of the mitochondrial genes Cytochrome Oxidase subunit I (COI), 16S rRNA (16S) and nuclear gene 28S rRNA were amplified using the primers listed in Suppl. material
The data set includes 102 sequences generated from the 57 specimens and 55 published sequences from GenBank. Overall the data set consists of 46 sequences of COI from 14 species, 28 sequences of 16S rDNA from 12 species, and 28 sequences of 28S rDNA from 12 species (Suppl. material
The pattern of labial chaetotaxy follows Gisin’s system (1967) and
Ant. I–IV antennal segment I–IV;
Abd. I–VI abdominal segment I–VI;
Gr. cephalic group;
mac macrochaeta(e);
mes mesochaeta(e);
mic microchaeta(e);
ms S-microchaeta(e)/microsensillum(a);
psp pseudopore(s)
s ordinary S-chaeta(e)/sens;
tita tibiotarsus.
tric trichobothrium(ia);
Th. I–III thoracic segment I–III.
Order Entomobryomorpha Börner, 1913
Family Entomobryidae Schäffer, 1896 sensu Zhang et al, 2019
Subfamily Entomobryinae Schäffer, 1896 sensu Zhang and Deharveng 2015
Holotype : female on slide. Thailand, Khon Kaen province, Chum Phae district, Tham Nayn Noi (note: “tham” = “cave” in Thai), altitude 359 m a.m.s.l., 16.8292°N, 101.9848°E. 3.XII.2020; S. Jantarit, A. Nilsai, K. Sarakhamhaeng and K. Jantapaso leg. (sample # THA_SJ_KKN04), dark zone of a cave, by entomological aspirator. Paratypes: same data as holotype, 11 specimens (three female and eight subadults on slides). Additional material: same data as holotype, 3 specimens (in ethanol)
Holotype and 11 paratypes on slides deposited in NHM-PSU.
Habitus
(Fig.
The distribution map of the troglomorphic Coecobrya in Thailand and the habitus of the four new species. (1) A Coecobrya whitteni sp. nov. (2) B C. troglobia sp. nov. (3) C C. ellisi sp. nov. (4) D C. phitsanulokensis sp. nov. (5) C. chumphonensis Zhang & Nilsai, 2017 (6) C. sirindhornae Jantarit, Satasook & Deharveng, 2019 (7) C. polychaeta Zhang & Nilsai, 2017 and (8) C. cavicta Nilsai & Zhang, 2017. Scale bar: 1 mm.
Pseudopores
(Figs
Clypeus and mouthparts
(Figs
Antennae
(Fig.
Dorsal head chaetotaxy
(Fig.
Ventral head chaetotaxy
(Fig.
Tergite chaetotaxy
(Figs
Th. III with 23–26 mac. 2+2 sens laterally (Fig.
Abd. I with six central mac (m4i, m2–4, m2i, m4p), 1+1 ms and 1+1 sens laterally (Fig.
Abd. II with two (m3, m3e) central and one (m5) lateral mac, 2+2 tric without modified chaetae, 1+1 sens laterally and 1+1 mic near internal tric (Fig.
Abd. III with one (m3) central and three (am6, pm6, p6) lateral mac. 3+3 tric without modified chaetae, 1+1 sens laterally, 1+1 mic near m3, ms not seen (Fig.
Abd. IV with four central mac (M, A5–6, B5) and six (D3, E2–4, E2p, F3) lateral mac, 2+2 tric and about 19 long S-like chaetae and one mic in the middle below psp, without modified chaetae (Fig.
Abd. V with at least 6 obvious mac and several mes to small mac, and 3+3 sens (Fig.
Abd. VI not analysed.
S-chaetae formula from Th. II to Abd. V: 2+ms, 2/1+ms, 2, 2, ≈ 20, 3; ps not seen, as sens on Abd. IV 1/3 as long as S-like chaetae (Figs
Legs
(Figs
Ventral tube
(Figs
Furcal complex
(Figs
Genital plate. Female genital plate with 2+2 genital mic, male genital plate not clearly seen.
Coecobrya whitteni sp. nov. was found in the dark zone of a cave on the surface of the muddy ground, near the bank of a stream. It was also found in the upper levels on stalagmites, clay, gravel and rock surfaces. This species was found mainly in eutrophic habitats where piles of guano were well-presented. There was a big colony of the intermediate roundleaf bat (Hipposideros larvatus) inside the cave. The air temperature of the habitat where this species was collected was 22.9–24.0 °C and the relative humidity was 85%. In the same cave, and in the same chamber, at least six different stygobitic species were also observed in the small puddles: Aequigidiella aquilifera, Dugesia deharvengi, Heterochaetella glandularis, Siamoporus deharvengi, Stenasellus rigali and Theosbaena cambodjiana. The co-occurrence of these six species was first observed in 1987 (
Coecobrya whitteni sp. nov. is named in honor of the late Tony Whitten in appreciation of his enormous contributions to the discovery and conservation of karst and cave invertebrates across Asia.
Among the described troglomorphic Coecobrya species in Thailand, Coecobrya whitteni sp. nov. is near to C. cavicta Nilsai & Zhang, 2017 from Satun province, southern Thailand in the body length, dorsal head chaetotaxy, labial chaetae, number of sublobal hairs on maxillary outer lobe, number of mac on Abd.III and number of chaetae on ventrodistal part of manubrium. However, it differs from C. cavicta by the combination of various characters i.e. longer length of antennae, number of mac of dorsal tergits on Th. II (21–23 vs. 36–37), Th. III (23–26 vs. 35), Abd. II (2 vs. 3) and Abd. IV (11 vs. 18–20), number of inner teeth of claw (3 vs. 2) and number of smooth chaetae of trochanteral organe (18–21 vs. 15–16) (see Table
Comparison of troglomorphic Coecobrya in Thailand: C. chumphonensis Zhang & Nilsai, 2017, C. cavicta Nilsai & Zhang, 2017, C. polychaeta Zhang & Nilsai, 2017, C. sirindhornae Jantarit, Satasook & Deharveng, 2019, C. nupa Christiansen & Bellinger, 1992. C. whitteni Nilsai and Jantarit sp. nov., C. troglobia Jantarit and Nilsai sp. nov., C. ellisi Jantarit and Nilsai sp. nov., C. phitsanulokensis Jantarit and Nilsai sp. nov. Key: c = ciliated chaetae, s = smooth chaetae, ? = not given in literature description. Characters indicated in parentheses are rarely observed.
Characters/species | C. chumphonensis | C. cavicta | C. polychaeta | C. sirindhornae | C. nupa | C. whitteni sp. nov. | C. troglobia sp. nov. | C. ellisi sp. nov. | C. phitsanulokensis sp. nov. | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Body length | up to 2.82 mm | 1.72 mm | up to 2.58 mm | up to 2.6 mm | 2.0 mm | 1.8–2.3 mm | 2.0–2.4 mm | 1.6–2.1 mm | 1.8–2.3 mm | |
Ant./head ratio | 3.70–4.48 | 2.67 | 5.91–7.12 | 8.0–12.3 | 6.5 | 3.78–5.14 | 4.0–6.8 | 3.5–6.4 | 3.1–4.2 | |
Long smooth straight chaetae on Ant. I | absent | present | absent | present | ? | present | present | present | present | |
No. of paddle-like chaetae on Ant. II | 2–4 | ? | 1 | 10–12 | ? | not seen | not seen | not seen | not seen |
|
Number of chaetae on clypeus | ||||||||||
Prefrontal area | 3s | ? | 3s | 3s | ? | 3s | 3s | 3s | 3s | |
Facial area | 8s | ? | 2s; 7–10c | 2s; 7–10c | ? | 2s; 6c | 2s; 4c | 2s; 5c | 2s; 4–7c | |
Number of chaetae on dorsal head | ||||||||||
An area | 2 | 4 | 4 | 1 | ? | 4 | 5 | 3 | 5 | |
M series | 4 | 3 | 3 | 0 | ? | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | |
Group II (Gr. II) | 6(7) | 4 | 3 | 1 | ? | 4 | 4 | 4(5) | 4(5) | |
A0 | mac | mac | mic | mes | ? | mac | mac | mac | mac | |
Number of sublobal hairs on maxillary outer lobe | 3 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 4 | |
Lateral process of labial palp | short | short | long | long | short | long | long | long | long | |
Labial chaetae shape | mRel1l2 | mrel1l2 | M1m2rel1l2 | m1m2rel1l2 | M1m2rel1l2 | mrel1l2 | mrel1l2 | m(M)1m2rel1l2 | m1m2rel1l2 | |
Postlabial chaetae X | minute | minute | normal | normal | ? | minute | minute | normal | minute | |
Number of chaetae along cephalic groove | 4s; 5–7c | 3–4s; 7–8c | 6–7s; 5–10c | 7–9s; 3–7c | ? | 5–6s; 1–2c1–2mics | 6s; 1c; 2mics | 2–5s; 1–5c; 2mics | 4–7s; 1–2c; 1–2(3–4)mics | |
Chaetotaxy of Th. II | ||||||||||
Number of medio-medial mac | 4–6 | 3 | 7(6) | 3 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | |
Number of medio-sublateral mac | 3 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 3 | |
Number of posterior mac | 25–32 | 30–31 | 29–40 | 15–18 | 15? | 18–20 | 15–18 | 28–31 | 31–33 | |
Number of mac on Th. III | 32–35 | 35 | 35–43 | 32–35 | 15? | 23–26 | 24–27 | 29–36 | 32–33 | |
Number of mac on Abd. I | 6–7 | 6–7 | 8–9 | 6 | 4 | 6 | 6 | 7 | 7 | |
Number of central mac on Abd. II | 3 | 3 | 4(3) | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3(4) | |
Chaetotaxy of Abd. III | ||||||||||
Number of central mac | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | |
Number of lateral mac | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2? | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | |
ms | not seen | not seen | present | not seen | ? | not seen | not seen | present | present | |
Chaetotaxy of Abd. IV | ||||||||||
Number of central mac | 7 | 7–9 | 6 | 6 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 9 | |
Number of lateral mac | 10–12 | 11 | 9 | 8 | ? | 6 | 6 | 9 | 8 | |
Ventral tube chaetae | ||||||||||
anterior face | 9–12c | ? | 12c | 10c | ? | 6–8c | 7–8c | 6–7c | 6–7c | |
posterior face | 13 | ? | 20–31 | 20–30 | 7 | 8–13 | 14–18 | 12–13 | 12–15 | |
lateral flap | 7(10) | ? | 9–12 | 7–8s (5c) | 6 | 6–7s (1c) | 7–9s (1–2c) | 6–7s; 1–3c | 7–8s | |
Tenent hair shape | usually pointed | pointed | pointed | pointed | pointed | clavate/pointed | clavate/pointed | pointed | pointed | |
Number of ungual inner teeth | 3 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 | |
Unguiculus outer edge shape | serrate | serrate | serrate | 2–3 teeth | ? | serrate | serrate | ? | serrate | |
Smooth chaetae on trochanteral organ | 12–22 | 15–16 | 15–25 | 12–18 | 16 | 18–21 | 19–23 | 17–23 | 19 | |
Chaetae on manubrial plaque | 4–7 | 4 | 4–10 | 3 | 5 | 3–6c | 5c | 5–6c | 5–6c | |
Chaetae on ventrodistal part of manubrium | 11–15c | 13c | 15–25c | 8–10c | ? | 13c | ? | 10–12c | 13+13c | |
Mucronal spine | nearly reaching mucronal apex | nearly reaching mucronal apex | nearly reaching mucronal apex | nearly reaching mucronal apex | beyond mucronal apex | nearly reaching mucronal apex | nearly reaching mucronal apex | nearly reaching mucronal apex | nearly reaching mucronal apex | |
Locality | Chumphon, Thailand | Satun, Thailand | Satun, Thailand | Satun, Thailand | Maui, Hawaii | Khon Kaen, Thailand | Khon Kaen, Thailand | Phetchabun, Thailand | Phitsanulok, Thailand |
Holotype : female on slide. Thailand, Khon Kaen province, Chum Phae district, Tham Phaya Nakharat, altitude 562 m a.m.s.l., 16°48'50.5"N, 101°57'23.9"E. 3.XII.2020; S. Jantarit, A. Nilsai, K. Sarakhamhaeng and K. Jantapaso leg. (sample # THA_SJ_KKN03), dark zone of a cave, by entomological aspirator. Paratypes: same data as holotype, 7 specimens (3 females and 4 subadults on slides). Additional material: same data as holotype, 6 specimens (in ethanol).
Holotype and seven paratypes on slides deposited in NHM-PSU.
Habitus
(Fig.
Pseudopores
(Figs
Clypeus and mouthparts
(Figs
Antennae
(Figs
Dorsal head chaetotaxy
(Fig.
Ventral head chaetotaxy
(Fig.
Tergite chaetotaxy
(Figs
Th. III with 24–27 mac, a4i and a6i as mac, 2+2 sens laterally (Fig.
Abd. I with six (m2–4, m2i, m4p, m4i) mac, 1+1 ms and 1+1 sens laterally (Fig.
Abd. II with two (m3, m3e) central and one (m5) lateral mac. 2+2 tric without modified chaetae, 1+1 sens laterally and 1+1 mic near internal tric (Fig.
Abd. III with one (m3) central, and three (am6, pm6, p6) lateral mac. 3+3 tric without modified chaetae, 1+1 sens laterally, 1+1 mic near m3, ms not seen (Fig.
Abd. IV with five central mac (I, A5–6, B4–5) and six (D3, E1, E2p, E3–4, F3) lateral mac, 2+2 tric and about 18 long S-like chaetae anteriorly, without modified chaetae (Fig.
Abd. V with 15–18 mac and several mes to small mac, and 3+3 sens (Fig.
Legs
(Figs
Ventral tube
(Figs
Furcal complex
(Figs
Genital plate. Female genital plate with 2+2 genital mic.
Coecobrya troglobia sp. nov. is restricted to the dark zone of the cave, where it was found in two chambers in an oligotrophic environment. Most individuals were found on the floor, on stalagmites and on the rock walls. The temperature in the dark zone was 21.4–23 °C and the relative humidity was about 75 %.
The name of the new species is derived from the Greek stem “trogle (τρώγλη)” which means “hole”, referring to the habitat of this new species which is restricted to the subterranean environment.
Coecobrya troglobia sp. nov. is also near to C. cavicta Nilsai & Zhang, 2017 from Satun province, southern Thailand in the number of mac of M series and Gr. II of dorsal head chaetotaxy, labial chaetae, number of sublobal hairs on maxillary outer lobe, number of mac on medio-medial area of Th.II, number of mac on Abd. III. However, Coecobrya troglobia sp. nov. is diffent from C. cavicta by having bigger body size, longer length of antennae, number of chaetae along cephalic groove, number of mac of dorsal tergits on Th. II (20–23 vs. 36–37), Th. III (24–27 vs. 35), Abd. II (2 vs. 3) and Abd. IV (11 vs. 18–20), number of inner teeth of claw (3 vs. 2) and number of smooth chaetae of trochanteral organ (19–23 vs. 15–16) (see Table
Holotype : male on slide. Thailand, Phetchabun province, Nong Phai district, Tham Tho, altitude 261 m a.m.s.l., 16.1231°N, 101.0222°E. 9.X.2019; S. Jantarit and A. Nilsai leg. (sample # THA_SJ_PNB06), dark zone of a cave, by entomological aspirator. Paratypes: same data as holotype, 12 specimens (1 male, 4 females and 7 subadults on slides). Additional material: same data as holotype, 8 specimens (in ethanol).
Holotype and 12 paratypes on slides deposited in NHM-PSU.
Habitus
(Fig.
Pseudopores
(Figs
Clypeus and mouthparts
(Figs
Coecobrya ellisi sp. nov. A Prelabral and labral chaetae B Labial palp C Ventro-distal complex of labrum D Subapical organ of Ant. IV E Mandibles F Outer maxillary lobe G Clypeal chaetae H Anterior side of ventral tube and Lateral flap I Lateral flap J Distal part of tita III and claw complex K Trochanteral organ.
Antennae
(Fig.
Dorsal head chaetotaxy
(Fig.
Ventral head chaetotaxy
(Figs
Tergite chaetotaxy
(Figs
Th. III with 29–36 mac. 2+2 sens laterally (Fig.
Abd. I with seven (a2–3, m2–4, m2i, m4p) mac, 1+1 ms and 1+1 sens laterally (Fig.
Abd. II with two (m3, m3e) central and one (m5) lateral mac, 2+2 tric without modified chaetae, 1+1 sens laterally and 1+1 mic near internal tric (Fig.
Abd. III with two (a2, m3) central, and three (am6, pm6, p6) lateral mac, 3+3 tric without modified chaetae, 1+1 sens laterally,1+1 mic near m3, ms present (Fig.
Abd. IV with eight central mac (I, M, A5–6, A5p, B4–6) and nine (D3, E1–4, F1–3, F3a) lateral mac, 2+2 tric and at least 8 long S-like chaetae, without modified chaetae (Fig.
Abd. V with at least 9 obvious mac mixed with several mes to small mac, and 3+3 sens (Fig.
S-chaetae formula from Th. II to Abd. V: 2+ms, 2/1+ms, 2,2+ms, ≈8, 3; as and ps sens on Abd. IV 1/3 as long as S-like chaetae (Figs
Legs
(Figs
Ventral tube
(Figs
Furcal complex
(Figs
Genital plate. Female genital plate with 2+2 genital mic, male genital plate not clearly seen.
Coecobrya ellisi sp. nov. was found deep in a cave which has many chambers, on the muddy ground floor, on stalagmites and on wet rock walls. Many individuals were found feeding on the patches of bat guano in mesotrophic to eutrophic habitats. The relative humidity of the cave was 86–89% and the temperature was 25.8–27.5 °C. The cave where this species was found is located in an isolated limestone hill and has a narrow, vertical, entrance about 25 m deep which is equipped with iron ladders. The cave is approximately 250 m long and 30 m deep and many of the chambers are dug out and enlarged. Bad air, with a low oxygen level (<18%), was also detected in some chambers, including the one where the new species was found which is at the base of the iron ladders.
This species is named in honor of Martin Ellis, a British speleologist who played a role in the Tham Luang cave rescue in Thailand (in 2018), and for his outstanding contribution to the study of cave fauna in Thailand. Our biological surveys have benefited tremendously from his support, including the discovery of this new species.
Coecobrya ellisi sp. nov. is close to and shares most morphological characters with C. phitsanulokensis sp. nov. from Tham Yai Nakarat, Noen Mapang district, Phitsanulok province. The two caves where these new two species were discovered are only 55 km apart in a straight line. They are similar in chaetotaxy of dorsal head, number of sublobal hairs on maxillary outer lobe, labial chaetotaxy, medio-medial and medio-sublateral mac on Th. II, number of mac on Abd. I, Abd. III, pointed tenent hair, anterior face of ventral tube and number of chaetae on manubrium plaque. However, C. ellisi sp. nov. can be easily distinguished from C. phitsanulokensis sp. nov. by the number of An mac on dorsal head (3 vs. 5), number of central mac on Abd. II (2 vs 3(4), number of central mac on Abd. IV (8 vs. 9), lateral mac on Abd. IV (9 vs. 8), number of inner teeth of claw (3 vs. 2) and number of chaetae on ventro-distal part of manubrium (10–12 vs. 13) (Table
Holotype : female on slide. Thailand, Phitsanulok province, Noen Mapang district, Tham Yai Nakarat, altitude 85 m a.m.s.l., 16.5052°N, 100.6864°E. 7.X.2019; S. Jantarit, A. Nilsai, K. Sarakhamhaeng and K. Jantapaso leg. (sample # THA_SJ_PLK01), dark zone of a cave, by entomological aspirator. Paratypes: same data as holotype, 7 specimens (3 females and 4 subadults on slides). Additional material: same data as holotype, 13 specimens (in ethanol)
Holotype and seven paratypes on slides deposited in NHM-PSU.
Habitus
(Fig.
Pseudopores
(Figs
Clypeus and mouthparts
(Figs
Antennae. Antennae long, approximately 3.1–4.2 times as long as cephalic diagonal. Antennal segments ratio as I: II: III: IV. 1: 0.5–0.73: 0.48–0.7: 0.41–0.68 (N = 6). Antennal segments not subdivided nor annulated. Antennal chaetal types not analyzed in detail. Ant. I ventrally with many smooth spiny mic of various sizes in its basal part, many subcylindrical, hyaline sens in its middle to apical part, and many long smooth straight chaetae. The paddle-like chaetae on Ant II absent. Ant. III organ with five sens not clearly seen in all specimens. Ant. IV without apical bulb. Subapical organite not distinctly knobbed, swollen, slightly enlarged apically, inserted dorsally.
Dorsal head chaetotaxy
(Fig.
Ventral head chaetotaxy
(Fig.
Tergite chaetotaxy
(Figs
Th. III with 32–33 mac. 2+2 sens laterally (Fig.
Abd. I with seven (a2–3, m4, m2–3, m2i, m4p) mac, 1+1 ms and 1+1 sens laterally (Fig.
Abd. II with 3(4) (a2, m3, m3ep, and m3e sometimes present) central and one (m5) lateral mac. 2+2 tric without modified chaetae, 1+1 sens laterally and 1+1 mic near internal tric (Fig.
Abd. III with two (a2, m3) central and three (am6, pm6, p6) lateral mac, 3+3 tric without modified chaetae, 1+1 sens laterally,1+1 mic near m3, ms present (Fig.
Abd. IV with nine central mac (I, M, A4–6, A5p, B4–6) and nine (D3, E1–4, E2p, F1–3) lateral mac, 2+2 tric and about 8 long S-like chaetae, without modified chaetae (Fig.
Abd. V with 12 obvious mac mixed with several mes to small mac, and 3+3 sens (Fig.
S-chaetae formula from Th. II to Abd. V: 2+ms, 2/1+ms,2,2+ms, ≈8, 3; as and ps sens on Abd. IV 1/3 as long as S-like chaetae (Figs
Legs
(Figs
Ventral tube
(Figs
Furcal complex
(Figs
Genital plate . Female genital plate with 2+2 genital mic.
Coecobrya phitsanulokensis sp. nov. was found from the twilight zone (ca. 20 m from the cave entrance) to the dark zone of the cave on wet and muddy ground and on the decaying organic material inside the cave. The length of the main passage in the cave is about 300 m. The temperature was 26.2–27.9 °C, the soil temperature was 24.1–24.3 °C and the relative humidity in the cave was 78–89 %. The cave has a seasonal stream in it, but there was no water during our visit. This cave is developed in a very small isolated limestone hill (0.4 × 0.9 km) surrounded by a flood plain agricultural landscape, with at least seven other caves having been reported in this hill.
This species is named after the type locality, Phitsanulok province, where the material was collected.
Among the troglobitic Coecobrya species C. phitsanulokensis sp. nov. is similar to C. ellisi sp. nov. from Tham Tho, Nong Phai district, Phetchabun province. For the species diagnosis see the remarks under Coecobrya ellisi sp. nov. and Table
The pairwise interpopulation distances of the four new species were 10.50–23.70% for COI, 24.11–43.33% for 16S, and 7.90–36.80% for 28S. Considering COI alone which is a favorable/typical DNA barcoding used for species identification, delimitation and discovery, the pairwise interpopulation distances between C. whitteni sp. nov. and C. troglobia sp. nov., which are most similar in morphology, was 10.60–11.40%. The distance between C. whitteni sp. nov. and C. ellisi sp. nov. was 20.90–23.20% and between C. troglobia sp. nov. and C. ellisi sp. nov. was 21.40–23.70% (Suppl. material
Both Bayesian inference (BI) and Maximum likelihood (Suppl. material
It is widely accepted that COI is the standard DNA barcode and the first choice for species identification, while 16S and 28S rDNA are used as complementary genes (
The results of the molecular approach supported the results of morphological species discrimination in separating the four nominal populations as valid species. The genetic distances between the populations clearly exceed the standard thresholds of 2 % (
Regarding their systematic position, C. phitsanulokensis sp. nov. (central Thailand) was recovered as the sister clade to C. polychaeta (southern Thailand) which is unexpected and raises a question on the evolutionary relationship, mainly because both species are 1,078 km apart from each other in a straight line. Their morphological characters are also largely different (Table
It is widely accepted that the troglomorphic Collembola prefer oligotrophic habitats with wet and moist environments (
Regarding the distribution range inside Thai caves, all non-troglomorphic species described so far always have a wide range of dispersion, from the entrance to deep inside the cave and all are always associated with eutrophic environments, especially with large amounts of animal feces, such as bat guano, and plant debris. Their populations are obviously abundant with many thousands of individuals in each cave. In contrast, all troglomorphic species have a narrow dispersion in the cave and are highly restricted to a chamber or chambers where it has been collected. Their populations are small to scare. They are usually associated with an oligotrophic environment. Interestingly, some species are also linked to the mesotrophic to eutrophic habitats. This is apparent in the case of C. whitteni sp. nov. and C. ellisi sp. nov. where many individuals were collected in areas where a large number of guano piles were present, indicating that troglomorphic Coecobrya in tropical areas are not always restricted to the oligotrophic habitat and they are also able to live or search for food in mesotrophic to eutrophic habitats where energy supply is high. This is contrary to the assumption that high-energy habitats are only exploited by non- or weakly troglomorphic species (
This study indicates that the genus Coecobrya in Thai caves is very diversified, highly restricted and endemic to a specific cave. This is well-explained in the case of C. whitteni sp. nov. and C. troglobia sp. nov. where both species share most morphological characters (Table
This key is modified from
1 | Outer maxillary lobe with 3 sublobal hairs; a single chaeta m on labium | 2 |
– | Outer maxillary lobe with 4 sublobal hairs; two chaetae m on labium | 5 |
2 | Labial chaetae as mRel1l2; dorsal head with 4+4 M chaetae and Gr. II with 6–7 chaetae | C. chumphonensis Zhang & Nilsai, 2017 |
– | Labial chaetae as mrel1l2; dorsal head with 3+3 M chaetae and Gr. II with 4 chaetae | 3 |
3 | Claw without unpaired inner tooth; central mac of Abd. II with 3 mac; central mac of Abd. IV with 7–9 mac | C. cavicta Nilsai & Zhang, 2017 |
– | Claw with unpaired inner tooth; central mac of Abd. II with 2 mac; central mac of Abd. IV ≤ 5 mac | 4 |
4 | Chaetae An of dorsal head with 4 mac; medio-medial mac of Th. II with 2 mac; medio-sublateral mac of Th. II with 1 mac | C. whitteni sp. nov. |
– | Chaetae An of dorsal head with 5 mac; medio-medial mac of Th. II with 3 mac; medio-sublateral mac of Th. II with 2 mac | C. troglobia sp. nov. |
5 | Antennae >8 times as long as cephalic diagonal; tita with a dorso-distal smooth chaeta in addition to the tenent hair; claw very slender | C. sirindhornae Jantarit, Satasook & Deharveng, 2019 |
– | Antennae 3–7 times as long as cephalic diagonal; tita without a dorso-distal smooth chaeta in addition to the tenent hair; claw moderately slender | 6 |
6 | Chaeta A0 of dorsal head as mic; Gr.II with 3 chaetae; medio-media on Th. II with 6 or 7 mac; mac on Abd. I with 8–9 mac; central mac of Abd. III with 1 mac | C. polychaeta Zhang & Nilsai, 2017 |
– | Chaeta A0 of dorsal head as mac; Gr.II with 4 or 5 chaetae; medio-media on Th. II with 3 mac; mac on Abd. I with 7 mac; central mac of Abd. III with 2 mac | 7 |
7 | Number of central mac on Abd. II with 2 mac; central mac of Abd. IV with 8 mac; claw with unpaired inner tooth | C. ellisi sp. nov. |
– | Number of central mac on Abd. II with 3 or 4 mac; central mac of Abd. IV with 9 mac; claw without unpaired inner tooth | C. phitsanulokensis sp. nov. |
We thank Mattrakan Jitpalo, Katthaleeya Surakhamhaeng and Kanchana Jantapaso for offering valuable help in the field. We are most grateful to Martin Ellis for proof-reading the English. We also thank Wisut Sittichaya, Faculty of Natural Resources, PSU for supporting us with the camera facilities. We are very thankful to Prof. Feng Zhang, Nanjing Agricultural University, China for sharing the COI sequences of seven non-troglomorphic Coecobrya from Thailand. This work was supported by the Tony Whitten Conservation Award 2020 for AN, the National Science and Technology Development Agency (FDA-CO-2563-11031-TH), and the Thailand Research Fund (RSA6280063) for SJ.
Maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree (ML)
Data type: ML phylogenetic tree
Explanation note: Maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree (ML) of Coecobrya species from Thailand based on the concatenated dataset (COI, 16S, and 28S sequences).
Table 1–3. Primers, genetic distance and Genbank accession numbers
Data type: molecular data
Explanation note: Table S1. Primers used for amplification and sequencing of the COI, 16S and 28S.Table S2. Inter/intraspecific genetic divergences for COI, 16S and 28S markers; Abbreviations for the code of four new species: KKN03, Coecobrya troglobia sp. nov.; KKN04, C. whitteni sp. nov.; PNB, C. ellisi sp. nov.; PLK01, C. phitsanulokensis sp. nov. Table S3. The sequenced terminals, and Genbank accession numbers used in this study.