Research Article |
Corresponding author: Luis Espinasa ( luis.espinasa@marist.edu ) Academic editor: Maria Elina Bichuette
© 2023 Luis Espinasa, Marie Pavie, Sylvie Rétaux.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Espinasa L, Pavie M, Rétaux S (2023) Protocol for lens removal in embryonic fish and its application on the developmental effects of eye regression. Subterranean Biology 45: 39-52. https://doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.45.96963
|
The lens plays a central role in the development of the optic cup. In fish, regression of the eye early in development affects the development of the craniofacial skeleton, the size of the olfactory pits, the optic nerve, and the tectum. Lens removal further affects olfaction, prey capture, and aggression. The similarity of the fish eye to other vertebrates is the basis for its use as an excellent animal model of human defects. Questions regarding the effects of eye regression are specifically well-suited to be addressed by using fish from the genus Astyanax. The species has two morphs; an eyeless cave morph and an eyed, surface morph. In the cavefish, a lens initially develops in embryos, but then degenerates by apoptosis. The cavefish retina is subsequently disorganized, degenerates, and retinal growth is arrested. The same effect is observed in surface fish when the lens is removed or exchanged for a cavefish lens. While studies can greatly benefit from a control group of surface fish with regressed eyes brought through lensectomies, few studies include them because of technical difficulties and the low survivorship of embryos that undergo this procedure. Here we describe a technique with significant modification for improvement for conducting lensectomy in one-day-old Astyanax and other fish, including zebrafish. Yields of up to 30 live embryos were obtained using this technique from a single spawn, thus enabling studies that require large sample sizes.
Eye regression, Lemsectomy, Sierra de El Abra, Stygobite, Troglobite, Troglomorphy
The lens plays an important role in the development of the optic cup (
The role of the lens in eye development has been studied in Astyanax. Lens development occurs rapidly in this species. By 18.5 hours post-fertilization (hpf), the Astyanax lens has rounded from the placode and is visible (
Manipulations of eye formation by transplantation of the embryonic lens or by lensectomy have been crucial to understanding eye-dependent and eye-independent processes. Cavefish craniofacial skeletons and the size of the olfactory pits in adults were found to correlate with eye development (
In this paper we describe the technical approach for removing a lens from a developing Astyanax surface morph that is generalizable to other species. Although this technique has been used in the past, prior studies reported low survivorship and a substantial degree of difficulty. The modified protocol described herein allows for much faster and more reliable removal of lenses that can yield high survivorship. We aim to provide a clear roadmap for other interested researchers to perform this experimental technique.
Animals were treated according to the French and European regulations for the use of animals in research. SR’s authorization for using animals in research, including Astyanax mexicanus, is 91–116. The Paris-Saclay Institute’s animal facility authorization number is B91-272-108. Specimens are those used in
Astyanax breeding has been described elsewhere (
Keep the embryos in EM in a 23 °C incubator until the desired stage. The lens becomes visible in Astyanax kept at 23 °C at 18.5 hpf. Hatching occurs at 24.5–28 hpf. The lens enters apoptosis at about 25 hpf. When conducting lensectomy on surface fish to replicate the effects of lens degeneration in cavefish, the optimum time is 1–3 dpf, or within 48 hrs after hatching. If lensectomy is to be conducted before hatching, remove the chorion manually with two pairs of sharp forceps, and incubate the embryos in 0.2% EDTA in Calcium-free Zebrafish Ringer’s (ZFR) for 30 minutes.
In previous protocols, two needles were used. One with a blunt tip needle made of a thin tungsten wire and a second one with a sharp tip made by holding the tungsten wire over a Bunsen burner for 1–1.5 minutes, burning off the metal, and creating a very fine tip). Previous protocols instructed lensectomies to be conducted by hand under a microscope. Since the lens is only about 50 μm, extreme precision is required to ablate the lens without harming other structures. Normal tremor of the hands makes this extremely challenging, even for highly trained people.
In this improved protocol, instead of using tungsten needles held by hand, microinjection needles were made from glass capillaries mainly with a Narishige’s PC-10 Dual-Stage Glass Micropipette Puller, with the puller was set to a one step weighted pull at 70.5 °C. Other brand micropipette pullers were tested and found to give similar results. Borosilicate glass capillaries are heated and pulled to get extremely fine and sharp needles, similar to those used for cell injections (Fig.
A for the preparation of dissection needles, microinjection needles are made from borosilicate glass capillaries with a Micropipette Puller B glass capillaries are heated and pulled to get extremely fine and sharp needles C instead of manipulating the dissection needle by hand, a micromanipulator is used. This dramatically reduces jittery movements that can puncture neighboring structures such as the brain or the heart. The micromanipulator allows precise puncturing around the lens with the needle’s movements controlled easily at less than 5 μm D clean needles are essential. Throughout the procedure, the needle progressively gets covered with a fatty substance that essentially blunts the needle. It is best to exchange it for a new one E embryo a week after a one-sided lensectomy in dorsal view. The left, lensectomized eye is regressing.
Style 1: With the micromanipulator, slowly bring down the needle by the side of the lens. Pressure down until it makes a puncture in the surface ectoderm/cornea at the junction between the lens and optic cup (Fig.
A specimens are transferred to a Petri dish after being in anesthetizing solution for 30 seconds or until embryos stop moving B absorb the excess liquid C add 2% agarose EM. The depth at which the embryo lies should not be too deep because the needle gets deflected from the target, and it is difficult to see the structures. However, it risks detaching the specimen from the agar when barely covered. After agarose solidifies, proceed with lensectomy D–G if lensectomy is to be done on both sides, with a scalpel, cut a rectangle of the agar around the specimen. Very gently slide the scalpel under the rectangle of agar with the specimen. Helped with twicers, flip around the agar slab, so the specimen is on the other side. More than one specimen can be done at a time to increase yield H add 2% agarose around the rectangle of agar or over the specimen if it was dislodged I after the second lensectomy is done, submerge in embryo media and gently dislodge the embryo from the agar with downward strokes starting around the tail and ending on the head.
Style #1 for doing lens ablations A with the micromanipulator, slowly bring down the needle by the side of the lens and pressure down until it makes a perforation on the surface ectoderm/cornea B repeat these punctures around the lens C insert the needle between punctures, and with a coordinated motion of the hand holding the petri dish and the micromanipulator, gently pull the needle out to tear the tissue between punctures D put the needle on one side, under the lens and push it out of the optic cup.
Style 2: With the micromanipulator, slowly bring down the needle by the side of the lens and puncture the surface ectoderm. While inserted, position the needle so that it is under the lens (Fig.
Style #2 for doing lens ablations A with the micromanipulator, slowly bring down the needle by the side of the lens and puncture the surface ectoderm. While inside the optic cup, position the needle so that it is under the lens B with a coordinated motion of the hand holding the Petri dish and the micromanipulator, move the needle away from the eye with the lens position in the center. The optic cup will distend until it rips open, with the lens bursting out of the eye cup.
Style 3: With the micromanipulator, slowly bring down the needle just by the side of the lens, closer than the previous two styles, and puncture the overlying ectoderm. Position the needle so that it is above the lens instead of below (Fig.
Style #3 for doing lens ablations A with the micromanipulator, slowly bring down the needle just by the side of the lens, closer than the previous two styles, and puncture the surface ectoderm. While inside the optic cup, position the needle so that it is above the lens instead of below. Gently scrape the overlaying agarose and scrape the tissue over the lens B the tissue will tear, and the lens will float up if there is liquid. It may need some nudging with the needle.
Style #3 works best in younger embryos that have just hatched. In older specimens, the tissue covering the lens has grown, which may require the stronger tearing of styles #1 or #2. Style #3 is the preferred style of lens removal if lenses are to be collected for transplants or other studies.
In this case, at the beginning of the protocol, after embedding the specimen in 2% agarose, overlay it with EM containing 1.2% agarose. Use style #3 preferentially. Once free, lenses will float in the medium. Using the blunt needle, carefully push the lens of the donor to just above where the host lens would normally be, and then push it down into the eye with the blunt needle. The host lens may be discarded.
Leave donor and host embryos in 1.2% agarose for 30–60 minutes, then release them from the agarose using the sharp needle and transfer them into EM in the incubator.
Bilateral lensectomies using microinjection needles made from glass capillaries attached to a manual micromanipulator were extremely successful compared to previous results using tungsten needles held by hand (Hélène Hinaux, personal communication; Elipot et al. 2013). Two hundred fifty-six live specimens were obtained from three broods. Of them, 96 underwent lens ablations on both sides, and 160 did not, serving as control siblings. Both the experimental and the control groups were kept under the same conditions. Initial postoperative survival was 100%, as reported in
Time dedicated to conducting ablations in each brood was about 10 hrs, giving an average of about 3.3 successful double ablations per hour. All treated specimens developed normally and had equivalent body sizes to their untreated siblings. One week after the procedure, individuals on which a single side lensectomy was performed already one significantly smaller eye (Fig.
The technique for embryonic lens removal described for Astyanax fish constitutes a significant modification for improvement. It is also readily applicable to zebrafish. Production of healthy individuals with double lensectomies increases by at least an order of magnitude (Hélène Hinaux, personal communication). Hundreds of specimens can now be made available for study, thus solving previous sample size limitations that hindered research on the developmental effects of eye regression.
Compared with previous lens removal techniques performed on Astyanax or zebrafish (see video from
Healthy conditions for the breeding colony: Survivorship of embryos can be drastically different between laboratories due to the conditions in which parents and the embryos are kept. The technique described here can produce live embryos, with the limiting factor being the general survivorship of embryos within the specific laboratory conditions they are kept.
Clean needles: Throughout the procedure, the needles progressively get covered in what appears to be a fatty substance (Fig.
The agar’s depth significantly affects the efficiency of the procedure (Fig.
Gentle, slow motions are to be done with the micromanipulator throughout the process (Fig.
This procedure follows, to a large extent, the transplantation technique developed for cavefish by the lab of Bill Jeffrey (